ГалGal ГалатамGalaatlastele, главаpeatükk Послание к ГалатамPauluse kiri galaatlastele, главаpeatükk 3

Назначение Закона Моисея

Означает ли это, что закон противоречит обещанию Божьему? Конечно же, нет! Потому что если был дарован закон, который мог принести людям жизнь, то праведность пришла бы от этого закона.

Galaatlastele 3:21 eri tõlgetes

Vene

РСП (66 кн.) Итак, закон противен обетованиям Божиим? Никак! Ибо если бы дан был закон, могущий животворить, то подлинно праведность была бы от закона;

РСП (юбил.) Итак, закон против обетований Божиих? Никак! Ибо если бы дан был закон, могущий животворить, то подлинно праведность была бы от закона;

НРП Так что же, Закон противоречит обещаниям Божьим? Ни в коем случае! Если бы данный нам Закон был в силах давать жизнь, то оправдание действительно зависело бы от Закона.

Заокская (Кулаков) Значит ли это, что Закон противоречит обещаниям [Божьим]? Ни в коем случае! Ведь если бы дан был Закон, который мог наделить жизнью, то праведность действительно достигалась бы посредством такого Закона.

ВП Так что же, Закон противоречит обещаниям Всевышнего? Ни в коем случае! Если бы Всевышний дал нам Закон, который был бы в силах давать истинную жизнь, то оправдание действительно зависело бы от соблюдения Закона.

ВП-А Так что же, Закон противоречит обещаниям Аллаха? Ни в коем случае! Если бы Аллах дал нам Закон, который был бы в силах давать истинную жизнь, то оправдание действительно зависело бы от соблюдения Закона.

Десницкий Так что же, Закон противоречит Божьим обещаниям? Ни в коем случае! Если бы нас возрождал к жизни тот Закон, который некогда дал Бог, то и праведниками мы становились бы по Закону.

Кассиан Итак Закон противен обещаниям Божиим? Отнюдь нет. Ибо, если бы дан был Закон, могущий оживотворить, — праведность была бы действительно от Закона;

Eesti

OECV Kas Seadus on siis vastuolus Jumala tõotustega? Sugugi mitte! Sest kui oleks antud Seadus, mis suudab teha elavaks, oleks õigus kindlasti tulnud käsu kaudu.

Inglise

KJV (66 books) Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.

AFINT (Exp US) Is the Law, then, opposed to the promises of God? Absolutely not. For if a law had been given that could impart life, then righteousness would indeed come through the Law.

AFINT (Lit US) Is the Law, then, contrary to the promises of God? May it never be! For if a law had been given that was able to impart life, then righteousness would surely have been based on the Law.

ASV Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could make alive, verily righteousness would have been of the law.

BSB Is the law, then, opposed to the promises of God? Certainly not! For if a law had been given that could impart life, then righteousness would certainly have come from the law.

DRA Was the law then against the promises of God? God forbid. For if there had been a law given which could give life, verily justice should have been by the law.

EMTV Therefore, is the law against the promises of God? By no means! For if a law had been given which was able to give life, truly righteousness would have been by the law.

FBV So does the law work against God's promises? Of course not! For if there was a law that could give life, then we could be made right by keeping it.

GNV Is the Lawe then against the promises of God? God forbid: For if there had bene a Lawe giuen which coulde haue giuen life, surely righteousnes should haue bene by the Lawe.

LSV [Is] the Law, then, against the promises of God? Let it not be! For if a law was given that was able to make alive, truly there would have been righteousness by law,

NASB Is the Law then contrary to the promises of God? Far from it! For if a law had been given that was able to impart life, then righteousness would indeed have been based on law. NASB 2020

NIV (US) Is the law, therefore, opposed to the promises of God? Absolutely not! For if a law had been given that could impart life, then righteousness would certainly have come by the law.

NMV [Is] the law then against the promises of God-The Father? May it not be: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, truly righteousness should have been by the law.

OJB Is the Torah, mimeila (consequently, as a result), against the havtachot (promises) of Hashem? Chas v'Shalom (G-d forbid)! For if Gezetz had been given that had the ko'ach (power) to affect hitkhadshut (regeneration), then to be YITZDAK IM HASHEM (justified with G-d) would indeed have been based on ma'asim of Gezetz.

TCENT Is the law then opposed to the promises of God? Certainly not! For if a law had been given that was able to give life, truly righteousness would have come through the law.

T4T If someone should ask, “When God gave his laws to Moses long after he told Abraham what he was promising to give to him, was he changing his mind?” I would reply that God certainly did not change his mind when he did that! If God had given a law that could enable people to live eternally, then it actually would be because of people obeying that law that God would erase the record of their sins.

WEB (US) Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not! For if there had been a law given which could make alive, most certainly righteousness would have been of the law.