加갈 加拉太书갈라디아서, 章장 加拉太书갈라디아서, 章장 3

여러 번역본으로 본 갈라디아서 3:21

중국어

当代译本 (简) 这样看来，上帝的律法和上帝的应许是否互相矛盾呢？当然不是！如果颁布的律法能带给人生命，人就可以靠律法得到义了。

當代譯本 (繁) 這樣看來，上帝的律法和上帝的應許是否互相矛盾呢？當然不是！如果頒布的律法能帶給人生命，人就可以靠律法得到義了。

标准译本 (简) 那么，律法和神的各样应许是对立的吗？绝对不是！如果一个能使人得生命的律法被赐下，义就真是本于律法了。

標準譯本 (繁) 那麼，律法和神的各樣應許是對立的嗎？絕對不是！如果一個能使人得生命的律法被賜下，義就真是本於律法了。

现代标点和合本 (简) 这样，律法是与神的应许反对吗？断乎不是。若曾传一个能叫人得生的律法，义就诚然本乎律法了。

現代標點和合本 (繁) 這樣，律法是與神的應許反對嗎？斷乎不是。若曾傳一個能叫人得生的律法，義就誠然本乎律法了。

普通话本 这是不是意味着律法与上帝的许诺相抵触呢？当然不是！如果已颁布的律法能给人们带来生命，那么，人靠遵守律法就能得到上帝的认可。

한국어

KOERV 그렇다면 하나님께서 주신 율법이 하나님의 약속들과 어긋난다는 뜻입니까? 결코 그렇지 않습니다! 우리에게 주신 율법이 생명을 줄 수 있는 것이었다면, 하나님께서는 법을 근거로 하여 사람들을 받아 주셨을 것입니다.

영어

KJV (66 books) +2 Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.

AFINT (Exp US) +1 Is the Law, then, opposed to the promises of God? Absolutely not. For if a law had been given that could impart life, then righteousness would indeed come through the Law.

AFINT (Lit US) +1 Is the Law, then, contrary to the promises of God? May it never be! For if a law had been given that was able to impart life, then righteousness would surely have been based on the Law.

ASV +1 Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could make alive, verily righteousness would have been of the law.

BSB +1 Is the law, then, opposed to the promises of God? Certainly not! For if a law had been given that could impart life, then righteousness would certainly have come from the law.

DRA Was the law then against the promises of God? God forbid. For if there had been a law given which could give life, verily justice should have been by the law.

EMTV Therefore, is the law against the promises of God? By no means! For if a law had been given which was able to give life, truly righteousness would have been by the law.

FBV So does the law work against God's promises? Of course not! For if there was a law that could give life, then we could be made right by keeping it.

GNV Is the Lawe then against the promises of God? God forbid: For if there had bene a Lawe giuen which coulde haue giuen life, surely righteousnes should haue bene by the Lawe.

LSV [Is] the Law, then, against the promises of God? Let it not be! For if a law was given that was able to make alive, truly there would have been righteousness by law,

NIV (US) +1 Is the law, therefore, opposed to the promises of God? Absolutely not! For if a law had been given that could impart life, then righteousness would certainly have come by the law.

NMV [Is] the law then against the promises of God-The Father? May it not be: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, truly righteousness should have been by the law.

OJB Is the Torah, mimeila (consequently, as a result), against the havtachot (promises) of Hashem? Chas v'Shalom (G-d forbid)! For if Gezetz had been given that had the ko'ach (power) to affect hitkhadshut (regeneration), then to be YITZDAK IM HASHEM (justified with G-d) would indeed have been based on ma'asim of Gezetz.

TCENT Is the law then opposed to the promises of God? Certainly not! For if a law had been given that was able to give life, truly righteousness would have come through the law.

T4T If someone should ask, “When God gave his laws to Moses long after he told Abraham what he was promising to give to him, was he changing his mind?” I would reply that God certainly did not change his mind when he did that! If God had given a law that could enable people to live eternally, then it actually would be because of people obeying that law that God would erase the record of their sins.

WEB (US) +7 Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not! For if there had been a law given which could make alive, most certainly righteousness would have been of the law.