RmРым RomanosРымлянам, capítuloраздзел Epístola de Paulo aos RomanosПасланне да Рымлян, capítuloраздзел 5

Рымлянам 5:16 у розных перакладах

Партугальская

NBV-P E existe uma diferença entre a dádiva de Deus e o pecado de um só homem: Por um só pecado veio o julgamento que trouxe condenação, mas a dádiva veio de muitos pecados e trouxe a justificação.

TfTP E há outra maneira em que os resultados de Deus ter livremente apagado o registro de nossos pecados se diferenciam dos de Adão ter pecado. Uma pessoa, Adão, pecou. Como resultado disso, Deus declarou que todos os seres humanos merecem seu castigo divino. Mas por haverem pecado muitas pessoas, a ação de Deus resultou no apagamento do registro dos pecados delas.

VFL Adão foi condenado depois de ter pecado uma só vez, mas a oferta de Deus é diferente. A oferta de Deus salva as pessoas mesmo depois de terem pecado muitas vezes.

Беларуская

Сёмуха І дар ня як суд за аднаго грэшніка; бо суд за адну правіну прыносіць асуду, а дар мілаты за многія правіны - апраўданьне.

Бокун I дар не такі, як тое, што праз аднаго, які зграшыў; бо суд праз таго аднаго — на асуджэньне, а дар [ласкі] — на апраўданьне ад многіх грахоў.

Руская

РСП (66 кн.) +2 И дар не как суд за одного согрешившего; ибо суд за одно преступление — к осуждению; а дар благодати — к оправданию от многих преступлений.

НРП +3 Последствия греха одного человека не могут быть сравнимы с тем, что дает этот дар. Суд за одно преступление повлек за собой осуждение, а дар благодати принес оправдание от множества преступлений.

Заокская (Кулаков) И то, что приносит с собой дар Божий, никак не сравнимо с последствиями греха одного человека. Тогда всего одно преступление вызвало суд и суровый приговор, ныне же ответом на многие преступления стал дар благодати, который несет с собой оправдание.

СП (БЛ) Этот дар отличался от дара Адама, который, согрешив однажды, был осуждён, но Дар Божий был получен после многих грехов и сделал людей праведными перед Богом.

Десн. Этот дар не похож на былой грех: некогда один согрешил, и все были осуждены – а теперь при множестве грехов все оправданы!

Кассиан И не так, как чрез одного согрешившего — дар: ибо суд за один грех — к осуждению, а дар благодати — от многих грехов к оправданию.

Англійская

KJV (66 books) +3 And not as it was by one that sinned, so is the gift: for the judgment was by one to condemnation, but the free gift is of many offences unto justification.

AFINT (Exp US) +1 And the gift of justification is not like the result that came from Adam’s sin. For the judgment and verdict that followed from one man’s trespass resulted in condemnation for all, but the gracious gift that follows many trespasses—the accumulated sins of all humanity—resulted in justification or the declaration of righteousness.

AFINT (Lit US) +1 And the gift is not like that which resulted from the one who sinned. For the judgment from one trespass resulted in condemnation, but the gift from many trespasses resulted in justification.

ASV +1 And not as through one that sinned, so is the gift: for the judgment came of one unto condemnation, but the free gift came of many trespasses unto justification.

BSB +1 Again, the gift is not like the result of the one man’s sin: The judgment that followed one sin brought condemnation, but the gift that followed many trespasses brought justification.

DRA And not as it was by one sin, so also is the gift. For judgment indeed was by one unto condemnation; but grace is of many offences, unto justification.

EMTV And the gift is not as by one having sinned. For the judgment which came from one offense brought condemnation, but the free gift from many offenses brought justification.

FBV The result of the gift is not like that of the sin. The result of Adam's sin was judgment and condemnation, but the gift sets us right with God, despite our many sins.

GNV Neither is the gift so, as that which entred in by one that sinned: for the fault came of one offence vnto condemnation: but the gift is of many offences to iustification.

LSV and not as through one who sinned [is] the free gift, for the judgment indeed [is] of one to condemnation, but the gift [is] of many offenses to a declaration of “Righteous,”

NIV (US) +1 Nor can the gift of God be compared with the result of one man’s sin: The judgment followed one sin and brought condemnation, but the gift followed many trespasses and brought justification.

OJB And the mattanah (free gift) is not like the effect of that one Adamʼs averah. For the mishpat (judgment) is from one averah (transgression) to the gezar din (verdict) of ashem (guilty), to harsha'ah (condemnation as guilty); but the effect of the unmerited Chen v'Chesed Hashem is from averot rabbot (many transgressions) to zikkuy (acquittal), to that of being YITZDAK IM HASHEM (“justified with G-d,” i.e., acquittal, justification with Hashem of the Many).

TCENT And the gift cannot be compared to the result of the one man's sin; for the judgment that arose from one trespass brought condemnation, but the gift that arose from many trespasses brought justification.

T4T And there is another way in which God’s freely erasing the record of our sins is not like the results of Adam’s sinning. One person, Adam, sinned. As a result, God declared that all people deserve to be punished. Many people sinned. But what God did was that he erased the record of their sins without their earning it.

WEB (US) +4 The gift is not as through one who sinned; for the judgment came by one to condemnation, but the free gift followed many trespasses to justification.

WEB (UK) +2 The gift is not as through one who sinned; for the judgement came by one to condemnation, but the free gift followed many trespasses to justification.