RomРым Mga Taga-RomaРымлянам, kabanataраздзел Ang Sulat ni Pablo sa mga Taga-RomaПасланне да Рымлян, kabanataраздзел 9

Пераклады Параўнаць

Tulad ng isang magpapalayok, may karapatan siyang hubugin ang putik ayon sa gusto niya. May karapatan siyang gumawa ng dalawang uri ng sisidlan mula sa iisang tumpok ng putik: Ang isa ay espesyal, at ang isa naman ay karaniwan lang.Jer 18:4; Jer 18:6; 2Ti 2:20

Рымлянам 9:21 у розных перакладах

Беларуская

Сёмуха Ці ж ня мае ганчар улады над глінаю, каб з таго самага месіва зрабіць адзін посуд на ганаровае ўжываньне, а другі - на буднае?

Бокун Ці ня мае ўлады ганчар над глінаю, каб з таго самага месіва зрабіць адно начыньне на пашану, а другое — на ганьбу?

Руская

РСП (66 кн.) Не властен ли горшечник над глиною, чтобы из той же смеси сделать один сосуд для почетного употребления, а другой — для низкого?

РСП (юбил.) Не властен ли горшечник над глиной, чтобы из той же смеси сделать один сосуд для почетного употребления, а другой — для низкого?

НРП Разве не вправе горшечник сделать из одного и того же куска глины одну посуду для почетного употребления и другую — для низкого?

Заокская (Кулаков) Не властен разве горшечник над глиной, не вправе ли он из одного и того же кома глины сделать некий сосуд для особого, а другой — для обычного употребления?

ВП Разве не вправе горшечник сделать из одного и того же куска глины утварь для почётного употребления и для низкого?

СП (БЛ) И разве глина не подвластна воле горшечника, когда он превращает кусок глины в особый сосуд или в простой кувшин?

Десницкий Разве не властен гончар над глиной, разве не может из одного куска сделать сосуд и для почетного употребления, и для низкого?

Кассиан Или не имеет власти горшечник над глиной сделать из одной и той же смеси один сосуд для почётного употребления, другой — для низкого?

Англійская

KJV (66 books) Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

AFINT (Exp US) Or does not the potter have the right and authority over the clay, to make from the same lump of clay one vessel for honorable, noble use, and another vessel for common, dishonorable use?

AFINT (Exp UK) Or does not the potter have the right and authority over the clay, to make from the same lump of clay one vessel for honourable, noble use, and another vessel for common, dishonourable use?

AFINT (Lit US) Or does not the potter have a right over the clay, to make from the same lump one vessel for honor, and another for dishonor?

AFINT (Lit UK) Or does not the potter have a right over the clay, to make from the same lump one vessel for honour, and another for dishonour?

ASV Or hath not the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel unto honor, and another unto dishonor?

BSB Does not the potter have the right to make from the same lump of clay one vessel for special occasions and another for common use?

DRA Or hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump, to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

EMTV Or does not the potter have the right over the clay, from the same lump to make one vessel for honor and the other for dishonor?

FBV Doesn't a potter have the right to use the same batch of clay to make both a decorative bowl and an everyday pot?

GNV Hath not the potter power of the clay to make of the same lumpe one vessell to honour, and another vnto dishonour?

LSV Does the potter not have authority over the clay, out of the same lump to make one vessel to honor and one to dishonor?

NASB Or does the potter not have a right over the clay, to make from the same lump one object for honorable use, and another for common use? NASB 2020

NIV (US) Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for special purposes and some for common use?

NMV Has not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

OJB Or does the potter not have the right over the clay to make from the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for dishonorable use?

RV Or hath not the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

TCENT Does the potter not have a right over the clay, to make out of the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for dishonorable use?

T4T Instead, ◄the potter certainly has the right to take some clay and from one lump of clay make one pot that people will honor and make another one for ordinary purposes [MET]./does not a potter have the right to take some clay and from one lump of clay make one pot that people will honor and make another pot for ordinary purposes?► [MET, RHQ] Similarly, God has the right to carry out what he purposes for people.

WEB (US) Or hasn’t the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel for honor, and another for dishonor?

WEB (UK) Or hasn’t the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel for honour, and another for dishonour?