Ga.Gal GálatasGalatabréfið, capítulokafli Carta de Pablo a los GálatasBréf Páls til Galatamanna, capítulokafli 3

Galatabréfið 3:21 í mismunandi þýðingum

Spænska

RV1909 ¿Luego la ley es contra las promesas de Dios? En ninguna manera: porque si la ley dada pudiera vivificar, la justicia fuera verdaderamente por la ley.

NBV [3:21–22] Luego entonces, ¿es la ley de Dios contraria a las promesas de Dios? ¡Por supuesto que no! Si pudiéramos salvarnos por la ley, Dios no nos habría proporcionado otro medio para escapar de la esclavitud del pecado, como dicen las Escrituras. La única manera de recibir la promesa de Dios es por fe en Jesucristo.

BES Entonces, ¿la Ley está contra las promesas de Dios? De ninguna manera. Porque si se hubiera dado una ley capaz de dar vida, entonces la justicia vendría realmente por la Ley.

VBL (NT) ¿De modo que la ley obra en contra de las promesas de Dios? ¡Por supuesto que no! Porque si hubiera una ley que pudiera dar vida, entonces nosotros podríamos ser justificados por el cumplimiento de ella.

PDT ¿Significa esto que la ley se opone a las promesas de Dios? ¡Claro que no! Dios nunca dio una ley que pudiera dar nueva vida al mundo. Si fuera así, podríamos estar aprobados por cumplir la ley.

Íslenska

OLO [3:21–22] Eru þá lög Guðs í andstöðu við loforð hans? Nei, vissulega ekki! Ef við gætum frelsast með því að halda lögin, þá hefði Guð ekki þurft að opna okkur aðra leið til að losna úr klóm syndarinnar – en Biblían leggur áherslu á að allir séu fangar hennar. Eina undankomuleiðin er trúin á Jesú Krist og hún er öllum opin.

Enska

KJV (66 books) +2 Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.

AFINT (Exp US) +1 Is the Law, then, opposed to the promises of God? Absolutely not. For if a law had been given that could impart life, then righteousness would indeed come through the Law.

AFINT (Lit US) +1 Is the Law, then, contrary to the promises of God? May it never be! For if a law had been given that was able to impart life, then righteousness would surely have been based on the Law.

ASV +1 Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could make alive, verily righteousness would have been of the law.

BSB +1 Is the law, then, opposed to the promises of God? Certainly not! For if a law had been given that could impart life, then righteousness would certainly have come from the law.

DRA Was the law then against the promises of God? God forbid. For if there had been a law given which could give life, verily justice should have been by the law.

EMTV Therefore, is the law against the promises of God? By no means! For if a law had been given which was able to give life, truly righteousness would have been by the law.

FBV So does the law work against God's promises? Of course not! For if there was a law that could give life, then we could be made right by keeping it.

GNV Is the Lawe then against the promises of God? God forbid: For if there had bene a Lawe giuen which coulde haue giuen life, surely righteousnes should haue bene by the Lawe.

LSV [Is] the Law, then, against the promises of God? Let it not be! For if a law was given that was able to make alive, truly there would have been righteousness by law,

NASB Is the Law then contrary to the promises of God? Far from it! For if a law had been given that was able to impart life, then righteousness would indeed have been based on law. NASB 2020

NIV (US) +1 Is the law, therefore, opposed to the promises of God? Absolutely not! For if a law had been given that could impart life, then righteousness would certainly have come by the law.

NMV [Is] the law then against the promises of God-The Father? May it not be: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, truly righteousness should have been by the law.

OJB Is the Torah, mimeila (consequently, as a result), against the havtachot (promises) of Hashem? Chas v'Shalom (G-d forbid)! For if Gezetz had been given that had the ko'ach (power) to affect hitkhadshut (regeneration), then to be YITZDAK IM HASHEM (justified with G-d) would indeed have been based on ma'asim of Gezetz.

TCENT Is the law then opposed to the promises of God? Certainly not! For if a law had been given that was able to give life, truly righteousness would have come through the law.

T4T If someone should ask, “When God gave his laws to Moses long after he told Abraham what he was promising to give to him, was he changing his mind?” I would reply that God certainly did not change his mind when he did that! If God had given a law that could enable people to live eternally, then it actually would be because of people obeying that law that God would erase the record of their sins.

WEB (US) +7 Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not! For if there had been a law given which could make alive, most certainly righteousness would have been of the law.