Co na to řekneme? Že Zákon je hřích? V žádném případě! Avšak nebýt Zákona, nebyl bych hřích poznal. Například o dychtivosti bych nevěděl, kdyby Zákon neříkal: „Nedychti!“7:7 Ex 20:17; Dt 5:21Exo 20:17
Kopyaha
Mga Taga-Roma 7:7 sa lain-laing mga hubad
Tseko
BKRCož tedy díme? Že Zákon jest hříchem? Nikoli; nýbrž hříchu jsem nepoznal, než skrze Zákon. Nebo i o žádosti byl bych nevěděl, aby hříchem byla, by byl Zákon neřekl: Nepožádáš.
SNCTím však nechceme říci, že zákon není dobrý. Vždyť právě zákon nám říká, co je hřích. Kdyby zákon nezakazoval touhu po cizím vlastnictví, ani bych nevěděl, že je to něco špatného.
Cebuano
APDKon mao kana, basig adunay moingon nga daotan diay ang Kasugoan. Dili gayod! Kay kon wala ang Kasugoan dili unta ako masayod kon unsa ang sala. Pananglitan, kon wala mag-ingon ang Kasugoan, “Ayaw kaibog,” dili unta ako masayod nga daotan diay ang pagpangibog.
What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.
What then shall we conclude? Is the Law itself sinful? Absolutely not! May it never be! But I would not have come to experiential knowledge of sin except through the Law’s revelation. For I would not have known the inner sin of coveting or lustful desire if the Law had not commanded, “You shall not covet.”
What then shall we say? Is the Law sin? May it never be! But I would not have known sin except through the Law. For I would not have known coveting if the Law had not said, “You shall not covet.”
What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Howbeit, I had not known sin, except through the law: for I had not known coveting, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet:
What then shall we say? Is the law sin? Certainly not! Indeed, I would not have been mindful of sin if not for the law. For I would not have been aware of coveting if the law had not said, “Do not covet.”
DRAWhat shall we say, then? Is the law sin? God forbid. But I do not know sin, but by the law; for I had not known concupiscence, if the law did not say: Thou shalt not covet.
EMTVWhat shall we say then? Is the law sin? By no means! On the contrary, I would not have known sin except through the law. For I would not have known lust unless the law had said, “You shall not covet.”
FBVSo what do we conclude? That the law is sin? Of course not! I wouldn't have known what sin was unless the law defined it. I wouldn't have realized that wanting to have other people's things for myself was wrong without the law that says, “Don't desire for yourself what belongs to someone else.”
GNVWhat shall we say then? Is the Lawe sinne? God forbid. Nay, I knewe not sinne, but by the Lawe: for I had not knowen lust, except the Lawe had sayd, Thou shalt not lust.
LSVWhat, then, will we say? The Law [is] sin? Let it not be! But I did not know sin except through law, for also the covetousness I had not known if the Law had not said:
NASBWhat shall we say then? Is the Law sin? Far from it! On the contrary, I would not have come to know sin except through the Law; for I would not have known about coveting if the Law had not said, “You shall not covet.”NASB 2020
What shall we say, then? Is the law sinful? Certainly not! Nevertheless, I would not have known what sin was had it not been for the law. For I would not have known what coveting really was if the law had not said, “You shall not covet.”
NMVWhat shall we say then? [Is] the law sin? May it not be. No, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, youi shall not covet.
OJBWhat then shall we say? That the Gezetz is considered as chet (sin)? Chas v'shalom! Nevertheless, I would not have experienced chet (sin) except through the Gezetz; for I would not have known chamdanut (covetousness, greediness) if the Torah had not said, LO TACHMOD (Thou shalt not covet).
TCENTWhat then shall we say? Is the law sin? Certainly not! Yet I would not have known sin except through the law. For I would not have known covetousness if the law had not said, “Yoʋ shall not covet.”
T4TSomeone might object, saying, “◄The laws that God gave Moses must be evil if our sinful desires are increased because of our knowing those laws. [MTY]/Are not the laws that God gave Moses evil if they stir up our sinful desires?►” [MTY, RHQ] I would reply that they certainly are not evil, even though our sinful desires are increased. What I would reply is that I, for example, realized that what I was doing was sinful only because of what is written {Moses wrote} in those laws. For example, I realized that coveting is sinful only because he wrote in those laws [PRS], “You must not covet.”
What shall we say then? Is the law sin? May it never be! However, I wouldn’t have known sin except through the law. For I wouldn’t have known coveting unless the law had said, “You shall not covet.”
Hulagway sa bersikulo
Dili mohaum ang teksto — pagamya kini o putla ang kinutlo.
Mga pulong ni Cristo:Kay gihigugma gayod sa Dios ang kalibotan
Ang imong mga hubad mao ang set sa kataposang pagtandi nga imong giablihan gamit ang “Itandi” o gihinumdoman; samtang wala pay set, ang unang pagtandi nga direkta nga giablihan — gikan sa bookmark o sa link gikan sa gawas sa site — mahimong set. Kung ang set adunay labing menos duha ka hubad ug ang tanan adunay niini nga bahin, maablihan ang pagtandi nga walay porma sa pagpili.
Butangi og bituon ang mga hubad nga gusto nimo sa mga paborito.
Font
Gidak-on sa teksto
Sa sinugdanan, anaa na ang Pulong. Ang Pulong kauban sa Dios, ug ang Pulong mao ang Dios
Makita dayon ang mga player nga walay pag-klik ug dili kini awtomatikong mo-play; ang panid nga adunay video mokontak dayon sa youtube.com. Samtang naka-on kini nga setting, ang mga video mo-load gikan sa YouTube.
Kargahi ang mga video gikan sa
Kung walay tubag ang YouTube, ang video makarga gikan sa server sa site kung adunay kopya didto.
I-reset ang mga setting
Ibalik namo ang tanang setting sa ilang default. Sigurado ka ba?