RmRom RomanosŘímanům, capítulokapitola Epístola de Paulo aos RomanosList Římanům, capítulokapitola 7

Překlady Porovnat

Então, o que podemos concluir? Que a lei é pecado? É claro que não! Eu não saberia o que o pecado é, a não ser que a lei o definisse. Eu não entenderia que desejar para mim as coisas que outras pessoas têm é errado, se a lei não dissesse: “Não deseje para si o que pertence a outra pessoa.” Êx 20:17

Římanům 7:7 v různých překladech

Portugalština

NBV-P Será que estou sugerindo que a Lei de Deus é má? Claro que não! Eu não teria conhecido o pecado, a não ser pela Lei. Eu não conheceria o que é cobiça se a lei não dissesse: “Não cobice!”

TfTP Pode alguém replicar, “A lei que Deus deu a Moisés deve ser má se desperta nossos desejos pecaminosos.” Diria eu, “Com certeza ela não é má, mesmo que desperte nossos desejos pecaminosos. Pelo contrário, eu, por exemplo, me dei conta de ser pecaminoso o que eu fazia só por ter lido o que Moisés escreveu na lei. Por exemplo, descobri que a cobiça é pecado porque ele escreveu naquela lei, “Não se deve cobiçar nada.”

VFL Não quero com isso dizer que a lei e o pecado sejam a mesma coisa. Não, de maneira nenhuma. Mas a lei era a única maneira de eu vir a saber o que é o pecado. Por exemplo, eu nunca saberia do pecado de desejar o que não me pertence se a lei não dissesse: “Não deseje o que não lhe pertence”.

Čeština

B21 Co na to řekneme? Že Zákon je hřích? V žádném případě! Avšak nebýt Zákona, nebyl bych hřích poznal. Například o dychtivosti bych nevěděl, kdyby Zákon neříkal: „Nedychti!“

BKR Což tedy díme? Že Zákon jest hříchem? Nikoli; nýbrž hříchu jsem nepoznal, než skrze Zákon. Nebo i o žádosti byl bych nevěděl, aby hříchem byla, by byl Zákon neřekl: Nepožádáš.

SNC Tím však nechceme říci, že zákon není dobrý. Vždyť právě zákon nám říká, co je hřích. Kdyby zákon nezakazoval touhu po cizím vlastnictví, ani bych nevěděl, že je to něco špatného.

Angličtina

KJV (66 books) What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.

AFINT (Exp US) What then shall we conclude? Is the Law itself sinful? Absolutely not! May it never be! But I would not have come to experiential knowledge of sin except through the Law’s revelation. For I would not have known the inner sin of coveting or lustful desire if the Law had not commanded, “You shall not covet.”

AFINT (Lit US) What then shall we say? Is the Law sin? May it never be! But I would not have known sin except through the Law. For I would not have known coveting if the Law had not said, “You shall not covet.”

ASV What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Howbeit, I had not known sin, except through the law: for I had not known coveting, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet:

BSB What then shall we say? Is the law sin? Certainly not! Indeed, I would not have been mindful of sin if not for the law. For I would not have been aware of coveting if the law had not said, “Do not covet.”

DRA What shall we say, then? Is the law sin? God forbid. But I do not know sin, but by the law; for I had not known concupiscence, if the law did not say: Thou shalt not covet.

EMTV What shall we say then? Is the law sin? By no means! On the contrary, I would not have known sin except through the law. For I would not have known lust unless the law had said, “You shall not covet.”

FBV So what do we conclude? That the law is sin? Of course not! I wouldn't have known what sin was unless the law defined it. I wouldn't have realized that wanting to have other people's things for myself was wrong without the law that says, “Don't desire for yourself what belongs to someone else.”

GNV What shall we say then? Is the Lawe sinne? God forbid. Nay, I knewe not sinne, but by the Lawe: for I had not knowen lust, except the Lawe had sayd, Thou shalt not lust.

LSV What, then, will we say? The Law [is] sin? Let it not be! But I did not know sin except through law, for also the covetousness I had not known if the Law had not said:

NASB What shall we say then? Is the Law sin? Far from it! On the contrary, I would not have come to know sin except through the Law; for I would not have known about coveting if the Law had not said, “You shall not covet.” NASB 2020

NIV (US) What shall we say, then? Is the law sinful? Certainly not! Nevertheless, I would not have known what sin was had it not been for the law. For I would not have known what coveting really was if the law had not said, “You shall not covet.”

NMV What shall we say then? [Is] the law sin? May it not be. No, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, youi shall not covet.

OJB What then shall we say? That the Gezetz is considered as chet (sin)? Chas v'shalom! Nevertheless, I would not have experienced chet (sin) except through the Gezetz; for I would not have known chamdanut (covetousness, greediness) if the Torah had not said, LO TACHMOD (Thou shalt not covet).

TCENT What then shall we say? Is the law sin? Certainly not! Yet I would not have known sin except through the law. For I would not have known covetousness if the law had not said, “Yoʋ shall not covet.”

T4T Someone might object, saying, “◄The laws that God gave Moses must be evil if our sinful desires are increased because of our knowing those laws. [MTY]/Are not the laws that God gave Moses evil if they stir up our sinful desires?►” [MTY, RHQ] I would reply that they certainly are not evil, even though our sinful desires are increased. What I would reply is that I, for example, realized that what I was doing was sinful only because of what is written {Moses wrote} in those laws. For example, I realized that coveting is sinful only because he wrote in those laws [PRS], “You must not covet.”

WEB (US) What shall we say then? Is the law sin? May it never be! However, I wouldn’t have known sin except through the law. For I wouldn’t have known coveting unless the law had said, “You shall not covet.”