RmRöm RomanosRömer, capítuloKapitel Epístola de Paulo aos RomanosDer Brief des Paulus an die Römer, capítuloKapitel 9

Übersetzungen Vergleichen

Um ceramista não tem o direito de usar a mesma argila para fazer tanto um vaso decorativo quanto um outro para o uso diário?Jr 18:4; Jr 18:6; 2 Tm 2:20

Römer 9:21 in verschiedenen Übersetzungen

Portugiesisch

NBV-P Quando o oleiro faz um vaso de barro, ele não tem o direito de usar o mesmo barro para fazer um vaso bonito para uso especial, e outro para uso comum?

TfTP Pelo contrário, o oleiro tem com certeza o direito de pegar um pouco de barro e dessa mesma massa fazer um pote que as pessoas vão honrar e outro para usos costumeiros. Semelhantemente, Deus tem o direito de realizar o que ele determinou para os seres humanos.

VFL Quem trabalha com barro não tem direito de usar o mesmo barro para fazer o que quiser? Ele não pode fazer um vaso especial e um outro comum?

Deutsch

Luther Hat nicht ein Töpfer Macht, aus einem Klumpen zu machen ein Gefäß zu Ehren und das andere zu Unehren?

ELO (1905) Oder hat der Töpfer nicht Macht über den Ton, aus derselben Masse ein Gefäß zur Ehre und ein anderes zur Unehre zu machen?

TKW Oder hat nicht der Töpfer Macht über den Thon, aus demselben Teige hier ein Gefäß zur Ehre, dort zur Unehre zu machen?

NeÜ Ist der Töpfer nicht Herr über den Ton und kann aus derselben Masse ein Gefäß für die Festtafel machen und ein anderes für den Abfall?

Englisch

KJV (66 books) Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

AFINT (Exp US) Or does not the potter have the right and authority over the clay, to make from the same lump of clay one vessel for honorable, noble use, and another vessel for common, dishonorable use?

AFINT (Exp UK) Or does not the potter have the right and authority over the clay, to make from the same lump of clay one vessel for honourable, noble use, and another vessel for common, dishonourable use?

AFINT (Lit US) Or does not the potter have a right over the clay, to make from the same lump one vessel for honor, and another for dishonor?

AFINT (Lit UK) Or does not the potter have a right over the clay, to make from the same lump one vessel for honour, and another for dishonour?

ASV Or hath not the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel unto honor, and another unto dishonor?

BSB Does not the potter have the right to make from the same lump of clay one vessel for special occasions and another for common use?

DRA Or hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump, to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

EMTV Or does not the potter have the right over the clay, from the same lump to make one vessel for honor and the other for dishonor?

FBV Doesn't a potter have the right to use the same batch of clay to make both a decorative bowl and an everyday pot?

GNV Hath not the potter power of the clay to make of the same lumpe one vessell to honour, and another vnto dishonour?

LSV Does the potter not have authority over the clay, out of the same lump to make one vessel to honor and one to dishonor?

NIV (US) Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for special purposes and some for common use?

NMV Has not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

OJB Or does the potter not have the right over the clay to make from the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for dishonorable use?

RV Or hath not the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

TCENT Does the potter not have a right over the clay, to make out of the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for dishonorable use?

T4T Instead, ◄the potter certainly has the right to take some clay and from one lump of clay make one pot that people will honor and make another one for ordinary purposes [MET]./does not a potter have the right to take some clay and from one lump of clay make one pot that people will honor and make another pot for ordinary purposes?► [MET, RHQ] Similarly, God has the right to carry out what he purposes for people.

WEB (US) Or hasn’t the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel for honor, and another for dishonor?

WEB (UK) Or hasn’t the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel for honour, and another for dishonour?

Russisch

РСП (66 кн.) Не властен ли горшечник над глиною, чтобы из той же смеси сделать один сосуд для почетного употребления, а другой — для низкого?

РСП (юбил.) Не властен ли горшечник над глиной, чтобы из той же смеси сделать один сосуд для почетного употребления, а другой — для низкого?

НРП Разве не вправе горшечник сделать из одного и того же куска глины одну посуду для почетного употребления и другую — для низкого?

Заокская (Кулаков) Не властен разве горшечник над глиной, не вправе ли он из одного и того же кома глины сделать некий сосуд для особого, а другой — для обычного употребления?

ВП Разве не вправе горшечник сделать из одного и того же куска глины утварь для почётного употребления и для низкого?

СП (БЛ) И разве глина не подвластна воле горшечника, когда он превращает кусок глины в особый сосуд или в простой кувшин?

Десн. Разве не властен гончар над глиной, разве не может из одного куска сделать сосуд и для почетного употребления, и для низкого?

Кассиан Или не имеет власти горшечник над глиной сделать из одной и той же смеси один сосуд для почётного употребления, другой — для низкого?