РимRom РимљанимаRómaiakhoz, поглављеfejezet Посланица РимљанимаPál levele a rómaiakhoz, поглављеfejezet 9

Más írás: latinica

Па, зар грнчар нема власт над глином да од исте смесе направи једну посуду за част, а једну за срамоту?Јер 18:4; Јер 18:6; 2. Тим 2:20

Rómaiakhoz 9:21 különböző fordításokban

Szerb

ДК (ћир.) Или зар лончар нема власти над калом да од једне гуке начини један суд за част а други за срамоту?

DK (lat.) Ili zar lončar nema vlasti nad kalom da od jedne guke načini jedan sud za čast a drugi za sramotu?

НСП (ћир.) Коначно, зар грнчар нема право да од исте глине начини једну посуду за свечане прилике, а другу за свакодневну употребу?

NSP (lat.) Konačno, zar grnčar nema pravo da od iste gline načini jednu posudu za svečane prilike, a drugu za svakodnevnu upotrebu?

SSP (lat.) Pa, zar grnčar nema vlast nad glinom da od iste smese napravi jednu posudu za čast, a jednu za sramotu?

Magyar

Károli (1908) Avagy nincsen-é a fazekasnak hatalma az agyagon, hogy ugyanazon gyuradékból némely edényt tisztességre, némelyt pedig becstelenségre csináljon?

OEIV A fazekasnak nincs-e hatalma az agyagon, hogy ugyanabból az anyagból az egyik edényt ékességre, a másikat pedig közönséges használatra készítse?

Angol

KJV (66 books) Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

AFINT (Exp US) Or does not the potter have the right and authority over the clay, to make from the same lump of clay one vessel for honorable, noble use, and another vessel for common, dishonorable use?

AFINT (Exp UK) Or does not the potter have the right and authority over the clay, to make from the same lump of clay one vessel for honourable, noble use, and another vessel for common, dishonourable use?

AFINT (Lit US) Or does not the potter have a right over the clay, to make from the same lump one vessel for honor, and another for dishonor?

AFINT (Lit UK) Or does not the potter have a right over the clay, to make from the same lump one vessel for honour, and another for dishonour?

ASV Or hath not the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel unto honor, and another unto dishonor?

BSB Does not the potter have the right to make from the same lump of clay one vessel for special occasions and another for common use?

DRA Or hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump, to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

EMTV Or does not the potter have the right over the clay, from the same lump to make one vessel for honor and the other for dishonor?

FBV Doesn't a potter have the right to use the same batch of clay to make both a decorative bowl and an everyday pot?

GNV Hath not the potter power of the clay to make of the same lumpe one vessell to honour, and another vnto dishonour?

LSV Does the potter not have authority over the clay, out of the same lump to make one vessel to honor and one to dishonor?

NASB Or does the potter not have a right over the clay, to make from the same lump one object for honorable use, and another for common use? NASB 2020

NIV (US) Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for special purposes and some for common use?

NMV Has not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

OJB Or does the potter not have the right over the clay to make from the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for dishonorable use?

RV Or hath not the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

TCENT Does the potter not have a right over the clay, to make out of the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for dishonorable use?

T4T Instead, ◄the potter certainly has the right to take some clay and from one lump of clay make one pot that people will honor and make another one for ordinary purposes [MET]./does not a potter have the right to take some clay and from one lump of clay make one pot that people will honor and make another pot for ordinary purposes?► [MET, RHQ] Similarly, God has the right to carry out what he purposes for people.

WEB (US) Or hasn’t the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel for honor, and another for dishonor?

WEB (UK) Or hasn’t the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel for honour, and another for dishonour?