罗Rom 罗马书Romerne, 章kapittel 罗马书Paulus’ brev til romerne, 章kapittel 9

Oversettelser Sammenlign

陶艺家用同一批粘土制作漂亮的碗和常用的锅，他难道没有权利使用吗？提后 2:20

Romerne 9:21 i ulike oversettelser

Kinesisk

当代译本 (简) 陶匠难道不可从一团泥中拿一部分造贵重的器皿，又拿一部分造平凡的器皿吗？

當代譯本 (繁) 陶匠難道不可從一團泥中拿一部分造貴重的器皿，又拿一部分造平凡的器皿嗎？

标准译本 (简) 难道陶匠没有权柄从同一团泥中，既造出贵重的器皿，又造出卑贱的器皿吗？

標準譯本 (繁) 難道陶匠沒有權柄從同一團泥中，既造出貴重的器皿，又造出卑賤的器皿嗎？

现代标点和合本 (简) 窑匠难道没有权柄从一团泥里拿一块做成贵重的器皿，又拿一块做成卑贱的器皿吗？

現代標點和合本 (繁) 窯匠難道沒有權柄從一團泥裡拿一塊做成貴重的器皿，又拿一塊做成卑賤的器皿嗎？

普通话本造瓦罐的人可随意制造他要造的东西，他可用同一团泥土造出不同的东西，不仅可以用它造一个特殊的器皿，也可以用它造一个日常用的普通器皿。

Norsk bokmål

ONLNT Når en pottemaker finner fram sin leire, har han ikke da rett til å forme en vakker krukke som er til pynt, og en annen gjenstand som dere kan bruke til å kaste søppel i av den samme leirklumpen?

Engelsk

KJV (66 books) Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

AFINT (Exp US) Or does not the potter have the right and authority over the clay, to make from the same lump of clay one vessel for honorable, noble use, and another vessel for common, dishonorable use?

AFINT (Exp UK) Or does not the potter have the right and authority over the clay, to make from the same lump of clay one vessel for honourable, noble use, and another vessel for common, dishonourable use?

AFINT (Lit US) Or does not the potter have a right over the clay, to make from the same lump one vessel for honor, and another for dishonor?

AFINT (Lit UK) Or does not the potter have a right over the clay, to make from the same lump one vessel for honour, and another for dishonour?

ASV Or hath not the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel unto honor, and another unto dishonor?

BSB Does not the potter have the right to make from the same lump of clay one vessel for special occasions and another for common use?

DRA Or hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump, to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

EMTV Or does not the potter have the right over the clay, from the same lump to make one vessel for honor and the other for dishonor?

FBV Doesn't a potter have the right to use the same batch of clay to make both a decorative bowl and an everyday pot?

GNV Hath not the potter power of the clay to make of the same lumpe one vessell to honour, and another vnto dishonour?

LSV Does the potter not have authority over the clay, out of the same lump to make one vessel to honor and one to dishonor?

NIV (US) Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for special purposes and some for common use?

NMV Has not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

OJB Or does the potter not have the right over the clay to make from the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for dishonorable use?

RV Or hath not the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

TCENT Does the potter not have a right over the clay, to make out of the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for dishonorable use?

T4T Instead, ◄the potter certainly has the right to take some clay and from one lump of clay make one pot that people will honor and make another one for ordinary purposes [MET]./does not a potter have the right to take some clay and from one lump of clay make one pot that people will honor and make another pot for ordinary purposes?► [MET, RHQ] Similarly, God has the right to carry out what he purposes for people.

WEB (US) Or hasn’t the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel for honor, and another for dishonor?

WEB (UK) Or hasn’t the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel for honour, and another for dishonour?