Php FilipiFilippenzen, pasalhoofdstuk Surat Paulus Kepada Gereja Di FilipiDe brief aan de Filippenzen, pasalhoofdstuk 2

Vertalingen Vergelijken

Meskipun di dalam segala hal Dia adalah Allah,

Dia tidak menganggap hal itu

sebagai sesuatu yang harus dipertahankan.2Co 4:4; Col 1:15

Filippenzen 2:6 in verschillende vertalingen

Indonesisch

AMD Ia sama dengan Allah dalam segala hal, tetapi Ia tidak menganggap kesamaan-Nya dengan Allah sesuatu yang digunakan demi diri-Nya sendiri.

Nederlands

Canisius Want hoewel Hij Gods gestalte bezat en zijn gelijkheid met God geen roof hoefde achten,
GBV Hoewel Hij de hoedanigheid van God bezat, maakte Hij geen aanspraak op zijn gelijkheid aan God,

Engels

KJV (66 books) Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:
AFINT (Exp US) who, though He existed in the very form of God, did not regard His equality with God as something to exploit for His own advantage,
AFINT (Lit US) who, although He existed in the form of God, did not consider equality with God a thing to be grasped,
ASV who, existing in the form of God, counted not the being on an equality with God a thing to be grasped,
BSB Who, existing in the form of God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
EMTV who, existing in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God,
FBV Though in his nature he was always God, he wasn't concerned to cling onto his equality with God.
GNV Who being in ye forme of God, thought it no robberie to be equall with God:
LSV who, being in the form of God, thought [it] not something to be seized to be equal to God,
NASB who, as He already existed in the form of God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped, NASB 2020
NIV (US) Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage;
NMV Who, being in the form of God-The Father, thought it not robbery to be equal with God-The Father:
OJB Who, though existing in the demut of the mode of being of Elohim, nevertheless Moshiach did not regard being equal with G-d as a thing to be seized,
RV who, being in the form of God, counted it not a prize to be on an equality with God,
TCENT who, though he was in the form of God, did not consider equality with God as something to be exploited,
T4T Although he has the same nature as God has, he did not insist on keeping all the privileges of being equal with God.
WEB (US) who, existing in the form of God, didn’t consider equality with God a thing to be grasped,