Рим Римлянам, глава Послание к Римлянам, глава 9
Римљанима 9:21 у различитим преводима
Руски
РСП (66 кн.)
Не властен ли горшечник над глиною, чтобы из той же смеси сделать один сосуд для почетного употребления, а другой — для низкого?
РСП (юбил.)
Не властен ли горшечник над глиной, чтобы из той же смеси сделать один сосуд для почетного употребления, а другой — для низкого?
Заокская (Кулаков)
Не властен разве горшечник над глиной, не вправе ли он из одного и того же кома глины сделать некий сосуд для особого, а другой — для обычного употребления?
ВП
Разве не вправе горшечник сделать из одного и того же куска глины утварь для почётного употребления и для низкого?
СП (БЛ)
И разве глина не подвластна воле горшечника, когда он превращает кусок глины в особый сосуд или в простой кувшин?
Десницкий
Разве не властен гончар над глиной, разве не может из одного куска сделать сосуд и для почетного употребления, и для низкого?
Кассиан
Или не имеет власти горшечник над глиной сделать из одной и той же смеси один сосуд для почётного употребления, другой — для низкого?
Српски
ДК (ћир.)
Или зар лончар нема власти над калом да од једне гуке начини један суд за част а други за срамоту?
DK (lat.)
Ili zar lončar nema vlasti nad kalom da od jedne guke načini jedan sud za čast a drugi za sramotu?
НСП (ћир.)
Коначно, зар грнчар нема право да од исте глине начини једну посуду за свечане прилике, а другу за свакодневну употребу?
NSP (lat.)
Konačno, zar grnčar nema pravo da od iste gline načini jednu posudu za svečane prilike, a drugu za svakodnevnu upotrebu?
ССП (ћир.)
Па, зар грнчар нема власт над глином да од исте смесе направи једну посуду за част, а једну за срамоту?
SSP (lat.)
Pa, zar grnčar nema vlast nad glinom da od iste smese napravi jednu posudu za čast, a jednu za sramotu?
Енглески
KJV (66 books)
Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?
AFINT (Exp US)
Or does not the potter have the right and authority over the clay, to make from the same lump of clay one vessel for honorable, noble use, and another vessel for common, dishonorable use?
AFINT (Exp UK)
Or does not the potter have the right and authority over the clay, to make from the same lump of clay one vessel for honourable, noble use, and another vessel for common, dishonourable use?
AFINT (Lit US)
Or does not the potter have a right over the clay, to make from the same lump one vessel for honor, and another for dishonor?
AFINT (Lit UK)
Or does not the potter have a right over the clay, to make from the same lump one vessel for honour, and another for dishonour?
ASV
Or hath not the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel unto honor, and another unto dishonor?
BSB
Does not the potter have the right to make from the same lump of clay one vessel for special occasions and another for common use?
DRA
Or hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump, to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?
EMTV
Or does not the potter have the right over the clay, from the same lump to make one vessel for honor and the other for dishonor?
FBV
Doesn't a potter have the right to use the same batch of clay to make both a decorative bowl and an everyday pot?
GNV
Hath not the potter power of the clay to make of the same lumpe one vessell to honour, and another vnto dishonour?
LSV
Does the potter not have authority over the clay, out of the same lump to make one vessel to honor and one to dishonor?
NASB
Or does the potter not have a right over the clay, to make from the same lump one object for honorable use, and another for common use? NASB 2020
NIV (US)
Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for special purposes and some for common use?
NMV
Has not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?
OJB
Or does the potter not have the right over the clay to make from the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for dishonorable use?
RV
Or hath not the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?
TCENT
Does the potter not have a right over the clay, to make out of the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for dishonorable use?
T4T
Instead, ◄the potter certainly has the right to take some clay and from one lump of clay make one pot that people will honor and make another one for ordinary purposes [MET]./does not a potter have the right to take some clay and from one lump of clay make one pot that people will honor and make another pot for ordinary purposes?► [MET, RHQ] Similarly, God has the right to carry out what he purposes for people.
WEB (US)
Or hasn’t the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel for honor, and another for dishonor?
WEB (UK)
Or hasn’t the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel for honour, and another for dishonour?