Exoอพย Exodusอพยพ, kapitolaบทที่ Druhá kniha Mojžíšovaอพยพ, kapitolaบทที่ 21

ฉบับแปล เปรียบเทียบ

Pokud se však vědělo, že býk byl trkavý již od dřívějška, ale jeho majitel ho nehlídal, musí nahradit býka za býka a toho mrtvého si nechá.

อพยพ 21:36 ในหลายฉบับแปล

เช็ก

BKR Pakli vědíno bylo, že vůl byl trkavý prvé, a nezavřel ho pán jeho: bez výmluvy ať dá vola za vola, a zabitý ať mu zůstane.

ไทย

OTCV แต่​หาก​เป็น​ที่​รู้​กัน​ว่า​วัว​นั้น​มี​นิสัย​ชอบ​ขวิด​แต่​เจ้า​ของ​ไม่​ขัง​ให้​ดี ก็​ให้​เจ้าของ​วัว​ชดใช้​โดย​ยก​วัว​ตัว​นั้น​ให้​อีก​ฝ่าย แล้ว​แลก​เปลี่ยน​เอา​วัว​ตัว​ที่​ตาย​ไป​เป็น​ของ​ตน”
ขจง. แต่​ถ้า​รู้​กัน​ไปทั่ว​ว่า วัว​ตัวนั้น​ชอบ​ขวิด แต่​เจ้าของ​ไม่​ยอม​ขัง​มันไว้ เจ้าของ​วัว​ตัวนั้น​จะ​ต้อง​ชดใช้​วัว​ตัวใหม่​ให้ แต่​วัว​ตัว​ที่​ตาย​ก็​จะ​ตก​เป็น​ของเขา เมื่อ​มี​คน​ขโมย​วัว​หรือ​แกะ​ไป​ฆ่า หรือ​ไป​ขาย เขา​จะ​ต้อง​ชดใช้ ถ้า​ขโมย​วัว​หนึ่งตัว​ต้อง​ชดใช้​ด้วย​วัว​ห้าตัว ถ้า​ขโมย​แกะ​หนึ่งตัว​ต้อง​ชดใช้​ด้วย​แกะ​สี่ตัว

อังกฤษ

KJV (66 books) Or if it be known that the ox hath used to push in time past, and his owner hath not kept him in; he shall surely pay ox for ox; and the dead shall be his own.
ASV Or if it be known that the ox was wont to gore in time past, and its owner hath not kept it in; he shall surely pay ox for ox, and the dead beast shall be his own.
BSB But if it was known that the ox had a habit of goring, yet its owner failed to restrain it, he shall pay full compensation, ox for ox, and the dead animal will be his.[’’]
DRA But if he knew that his ox was wont to push yesterday and the day before, and his master did not keep him in: he shall pay ox for ox, and shall take the whole carcass.
FBV But if it was known that the ox had repeatedly hurt people with its horns, and its owner had been warned but still didn't keep it under control, full compensation must be paid, ox for ox, but the owner can keep the dead animal.”
GNV Or if it bee knowen that the oxe hath vsed to push in times past, and his master hath not kept him, he shall pay oxe for oxe, but the dead shall be his owne.
LSV or, [if] it has been known that the ox is [one] accustomed to gore before, and its owner does not watch it, he certainly repays ox for ox, and the dead is his.
NASB Or if it is known that the ox was previously in the habit of goring, yet its owner has not confined it, he must make restitution of ox for ox, and the dead animal shall become his. NASB 2020
NIV (US) However, if it was known that the bull had the habit of goring, yet the owner did not keep it penned up, the owner must pay, animal for animal, and take the dead animal in exchange.
NMV Or if it be known that the ox has used to push in time past, and his owner has not kept him in; he shall surely pay ox for ox; and the dead shall be his own.
OJB Or if it be known that the shor hath habitually from mitmol (yesterday) gored, and his ba'al hath not kept it in the bull pen; he shall surely pay ox for ox; and the carcass shall belong to him.
RV Or if it be known that the ox was wont to gore in time past, and his owner hath not kept him in; he shall surely pay ox for ox, and the dead beast shall be his own.
Onkelos (Etheridge) But if it be known that the ox gored in time past and his owner did not keep him in, paying he shall pay ox for ox, and the dead one shall be his.
T4T However, if people know that the bull often attacked other animals previously, and its owner did not keep it inside a fence, then the owner of that bull must give the owner of the bull that died one of his own bulls, but he can take away the animal that died and do with it whatever he wants to do.”
WEB (US) Or if it is known that the bull was in the habit of goring in the past, and its owner has not kept it in, he shall surely pay bull for bull, and the dead animal shall be his own.