Exo2Mo Exodus2. Mose, kapitolaKapitel Druhá kniha MojžíšovaExodus, kapitolaKapitel 21

2. Mose 21:36 in verschiedenen Übersetzungen

Tschechisch

BKR Pakli vědíno bylo, že vůl byl trkavý prvé, a nezavřel ho pán jeho: bez výmluvy ať dá vola za vola, a zabitý ať mu zůstane.

Deutsch

Luther Ist's aber kund gewesen, daß der Ochse zuvor stößig war, und sein Herr hat ihn nicht verwahrt, so soll er einen Ochsen für den andern vergelten und das Aas haben.

ELO (1905) Ist es aber bekannt gewesen, daß der Ochse vordem stößig war, und sein Besitzer hat ihn nicht verwahrt, so soll er gewißlich Ochsen für Ochsen erstatten, und der tote soll ihm gehören.

ELO (modernisiert) Ist es aber bekannt gewesen, dass der Ochse vorher stößig war, und sein Besitzer hat ihn nicht verwahrt, so soll er gewisslich Ochsen für Ochsen erstatten, und der tote soll ihm gehören.

TKW Wenn es aber bekannt war, daß das Rind schon längst stößig war, und sein Besitzer es nicht sorgfältig gehütet hat, soll er als Ersatz für jenes Rind ein Rind hergeben, das tote aber soll ihm zufallen.

NeÜ Hat das Rind aber schon früher gestoßen und sein Besitzer hat es nicht eingesperrt, muss er ein lebendes Rind für das tote erstatten. Das tote darf er behalten.'

Englisch

KJV (66 books) +2 Or if it be known that the ox hath used to push in time past, and his owner hath not kept him in; he shall surely pay ox for ox; and the dead shall be his own.

ASV +1 Or if it be known that the ox was wont to gore in time past, and its owner hath not kept it in; he shall surely pay ox for ox, and the dead beast shall be his own.

BSB +1 But if it was known that the ox had a habit of goring, yet its owner failed to restrain it, he shall pay full compensation, ox for ox, and the dead animal will be his.’’

DRA But if he knew that his ox was wont to push yesterday and the day before, and his master did not keep him in: he shall pay ox for ox, and shall take the whole carcass.

FBV But if it was known that the ox had repeatedly hurt people with its horns, and its owner had been warned but still didn't keep it under control, full compensation must be paid, ox for ox, but the owner can keep the dead animal.”

GNV Or if it bee knowen that the oxe hath vsed to push in times past, and his master hath not kept him, he shall pay oxe for oxe, but the dead shall be his owne.

LSV or, [if] it has been known that the ox is [one] accustomed to gore before, and its owner does not watch it, he certainly repays ox for ox, and the dead is his.

NASB Or if it is known that the ox was previously in the habit of goring, yet its owner has not confined it, he must make restitution of ox for ox, and the dead animal shall become his. NASB 2020

NIV (US) +1 However, if it was known that the bull had the habit of goring, yet the owner did not keep it penned up, the owner must pay, animal for animal, and take the dead animal in exchange.

NMV Or if it be known that the ox has used to push in time past, and his owner has not kept him in; he shall surely pay ox for ox; and the dead shall be his own.

OJB Or if it be known that the shor hath habitually from mitmol (yesterday) gored, and his ba'al hath not kept it in the bull pen; he shall surely pay ox for ox; and the carcass shall belong to him.

RV Or if it be known that the ox was wont to gore in time past, and his owner hath not kept him in; he shall surely pay ox for ox, and the dead beast shall be his own.

Onkelos (Etheridge) But if it be known that the ox gored in time past and his owner did not keep him in, paying he shall pay ox for ox, and the dead one shall be his.

T4T However, if people know that the bull often attacked other animals previously, and its owner did not keep it inside a fence, then the owner of that bull must give the owner of the bull that died one of his own bulls, but he can take away the animal that died and do with it whatever he wants to do.”

WEB (US) +7 Or if it is known that the bull was in the habit of goring in the past, and its owner has not kept it in, he shall surely pay bull for bull, and the dead animal shall be his own.

Russisch

РСП (66 кн.) +1 а если известно было, что вол бодлив был и вчера и третьего дня, но хозяин его не стерег его, то должен он заплатить вола за вола, а убитый будет его.

РСП (81 кн.) а если известно было, что вол бодлив был и вчера и третьего дня, но хозяин его [быв извещен о сем] не стерег его, то должен он заплатить вола за вола, а убитый будет его.

НРП +3 Но если было известно, что бык бодлив, а хозяин не держал его взаперти, то он должен заплатить быком за быка, а тушу пусть возьмет себе.

Заокская (Кулаков) Но если уже было известно, что бык бодлив, а хозяин недосмотрел за ним, то он должен отдать своего быка за погубленного, а тушу животного может взять себе.

СП (БЛ) Если же бык и раньше бодал другую скотину, то владелец в ответе за быка. Если его бык забодает другого быка, владелец виновен в том, что выпустил быка на свободу, и должен заплатить быком за быка: должен обменять своего быка на убитого».