Römรม Römerโรม, Kapitelบทที่ Der Brief des Paulus an die Römerโรม, Kapitelบทที่ 7

ฉบับแปล เปรียบเทียบ

Was sollen wir nun sagen? Ist das Gesetz Sünde? Das sei ferne! Aber die Sünde hätte ich nicht erkannt, als nur durch Gesetz. Denn auch von der Lust hätte ich nichts gewußt, wenn nicht das Gesetz gesagt hätte: “Laß dich nicht gelüsten”. 2Mo 20:17

โรม 7:7 ในหลายฉบับแปล

เยอรมัน

Luther Was wollen wir denn nun sagen? Ist das Gesetz Sünde? Das sei ferne! Aber die Sünde erkannte ich nicht, außer durchs Gesetz. Denn ich wußte nichts von der Lust, wo das Gesetz nicht hätte gesagt: “Laß dich nicht gelüsten!”

ELO (modernisiert) Was sollen wir nun sagen? Ist das Gesetz Sünde? Das sei ferne! Aber die Sünde hätte ich nicht erkannt als nur durch Gesetz. Denn auch von der Lust hätte ich nichts gewusst, wenn nicht das Gesetz gesagt hätte: „Lass dich nicht gelüsten“.

TKW Was wollen wir nun sagen? Ist das Gesetz Sünde? Nimmermehr. Aber die Sünde wäre mir nicht zur Erkenntnis gekommen, wenn nicht durch das Gesetz. Hätte ich doch auch von der Lust nichts gewußt, wenn das Gesetz nicht gesagt hätte: Laß dich nicht gelüsten;

NeÜ Heißt das nun, dass das Gesetz Sünde ist? Auf keinen Fall! Aber ohne Gesetz hätte ich nie erkannt, was Sünde ist. Auch die Begierde wäre nie in mir erwacht, wenn das Gesetz nicht gesagt hätte: "Du sollst nicht begehren!"

ไทย

OTCV เช่นนี้แล้วเราจะว่าอย่างไร กฎบัญญัติคือบาปหรือ ไม่ใช่อย่างแน่นอน! อันที่จริงถ้าไม่ใช่เพราะกฎบัญญัติ ข้าพเจ้าก็ไม่รู้ว่าอะไรคือบาป เพราะถ้ากฎบัญญัติไม่ได้กล่าวว่า “อย่าโลภ” ข้าพเจ้าคงไม่รู้ว่าอะไรคือความโลภ

ขจง. แล้วจะว่ายังไงดี กฎนั้นบาปหรือ ไม่มีทาง อันที่จริงถ้าไม่มีกฎ ผมก็ไม่รู้หรอกว่าบาปคืออะไร เพราะถ้าไม่มีกฎเขียนไว้ว่า “อย่าโลภ” ผมไม่มีทางรู้ว่าความโลภเป็นอย่างไร

อังกฤษ

KJV (66 books) What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.

AFINT (Exp US) What then shall we conclude? Is the Law itself sinful? Absolutely not! May it never be! But I would not have come to experiential knowledge of sin except through the Law’s revelation. For I would not have known the inner sin of coveting or lustful desire if the Law had not commanded, “You shall not covet.”

AFINT (Lit US) What then shall we say? Is the Law sin? May it never be! But I would not have known sin except through the Law. For I would not have known coveting if the Law had not said, “You shall not covet.”

ASV What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Howbeit, I had not known sin, except through the law: for I had not known coveting, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet:

BSB What then shall we say? Is the law sin? Certainly not! Indeed, I would not have been mindful of sin if not for the law. For I would not have been aware of coveting if the law had not said, “Do not covet.”

DRA What shall we say, then? Is the law sin? God forbid. But I do not know sin, but by the law; for I had not known concupiscence, if the law did not say: Thou shalt not covet.

EMTV What shall we say then? Is the law sin? By no means! On the contrary, I would not have known sin except through the law. For I would not have known lust unless the law had said, “You shall not covet.”

FBV So what do we conclude? That the law is sin? Of course not! I wouldn't have known what sin was unless the law defined it. I wouldn't have realized that wanting to have other people's things for myself was wrong without the law that says, “Don't desire for yourself what belongs to someone else.”

GNV What shall we say then? Is the Lawe sinne? God forbid. Nay, I knewe not sinne, but by the Lawe: for I had not knowen lust, except the Lawe had sayd, Thou shalt not lust.

LSV What, then, will we say? The Law [is] sin? Let it not be! But I did not know sin except through law, for also the covetousness I had not known if the Law had not said:

NASB What shall we say then? Is the Law sin? Far from it! On the contrary, I would not have come to know sin except through the Law; for I would not have known about coveting if the Law had not said, “You shall not covet.” NASB 2020

NIV (US) What shall we say, then? Is the law sinful? Certainly not! Nevertheless, I would not have known what sin was had it not been for the law. For I would not have known what coveting really was if the law had not said, “You shall not covet.”

NMV What shall we say then? [Is] the law sin? May it not be. No, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, youi shall not covet.

OJB What then shall we say? That the Gezetz is considered as chet (sin)? Chas v'shalom! Nevertheless, I would not have experienced chet (sin) except through the Gezetz; for I would not have known chamdanut (covetousness, greediness) if the Torah had not said, LO TACHMOD (Thou shalt not covet).

TCENT What then shall we say? Is the law sin? Certainly not! Yet I would not have known sin except through the law. For I would not have known covetousness if the law had not said, “Yoʋ shall not covet.”

T4T Someone might object, saying, “◄The laws that God gave Moses must be evil if our sinful desires are increased because of our knowing those laws. [MTY]/Are not the laws that God gave Moses evil if they stir up our sinful desires?►” [MTY, RHQ] I would reply that they certainly are not evil, even though our sinful desires are increased. What I would reply is that I, for example, realized that what I was doing was sinful only because of what is written {Moses wrote} in those laws. For example, I realized that coveting is sinful only because he wrote in those laws [PRS], “You must not covet.”

WEB (US) What shall we say then? Is the law sin? May it never be! However, I wouldn’t have known sin except through the law. For I wouldn’t have known coveting unless the law had said, “You shall not covet.”