Rom罗 Romans罗马书, chapter章 Epistle to the Romans罗马书, chapter章 7

罗马书 7:7的不同译本

英语

KJV (66 books) +2 What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.

AFINT (Exp US) +1 What then shall we conclude? Is the Law itself sinful? Absolutely not! May it never be! But I would not have come to experiential knowledge of sin except through the Law’s revelation. For I would not have known the inner sin of coveting or lustful desire if the Law had not commanded, “You shall not covet.”

AFINT (Lit US) +1 What then shall we say? Is the Law sin? May it never be! But I would not have known sin except through the Law. For I would not have known coveting if the Law had not said, “You shall not covet.”

ASV +1 What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Howbeit, I had not known sin, except through the law: for I had not known coveting, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet:

BSB +1 What then shall we say? Is the law sin? Certainly not! Indeed, I would not have been mindful of sin if not for the law. For I would not have been aware of coveting if the law had not said, “Do not covet.”

DRA What shall we say, then? Is the law sin? God forbid. But I do not know sin, but by the law; for I had not known concupiscence, if the law did not say: Thou shalt not covet.

EMTV What shall we say then? Is the law sin? By no means! On the contrary, I would not have known sin except through the law. For I would not have known lust unless the law had said, “You shall not covet.”

FBV So what do we conclude? That the law is sin? Of course not! I wouldn't have known what sin was unless the law defined it. I wouldn't have realized that wanting to have other people's things for myself was wrong without the law that says, “Don't desire for yourself what belongs to someone else.”

GNV What shall we say then? Is the Lawe sinne? God forbid. Nay, I knewe not sinne, but by the Lawe: for I had not knowen lust, except the Lawe had sayd, Thou shalt not lust.

LSV What, then, will we say? The Law [is] sin? Let it not be! But I did not know sin except through law, for also the covetousness I had not known if the Law had not said:

NASB What shall we say then? Is the Law sin? Far from it! On the contrary, I would not have come to know sin except through the Law; for I would not have known about coveting if the Law had not said, “You shall not covet.” NASB 2020

NIV (US) +1 What shall we say, then? Is the law sinful? Certainly not! Nevertheless, I would not have known what sin was had it not been for the law. For I would not have known what coveting really was if the law had not said, “You shall not covet.”

OJB What then shall we say? That the Gezetz is considered as chet (sin)? Chas v'shalom! Nevertheless, I would not have experienced chet (sin) except through the Gezetz; for I would not have known chamdanut (covetousness, greediness) if the Torah had not said, LO TACHMOD (Thou shalt not covet).

TCENT What then shall we say? Is the law sin? Certainly not! Yet I would not have known sin except through the law. For I would not have known covetousness if the law had not said, “Yoʋ shall not covet.”

T4T Someone might object, saying, “◄The laws that God gave Moses must be evil if our sinful desires are increased because of our knowing those laws. [MTY]/Are not the laws that God gave Moses evil if they stir up our sinful desires?►” [MTY, RHQ] I would reply that they certainly are not evil, even though our sinful desires are increased. What I would reply is that I, for example, realized that what I was doing was sinful only because of what is written {Moses wrote} in those laws. For example, I realized that coveting is sinful only because he wrote in those laws [PRS], “You must not covet.”

WEB (US) +7 What shall we say then? Is the law sin? May it never be! However, I wouldn’t have known sin except through the law. For I wouldn’t have known coveting unless the law had said, “You shall not covet.”

中文

当代译本 (简) 那么，我们该怎么说呢？律法是罪吗？当然不是！要是没有律法，我就不知道什么是罪。律法若不说“不可贪心”，我就不知道什么是贪心。

當代譯本 (繁) 那麼，我們該怎麼說呢？律法是罪嗎？當然不是！要是沒有律法，我就不知道什麼是罪。律法若不說「不可貪心」，我就不知道什麼是貪心。

标准译本 (简) 那么，我们要怎么说呢？难道律法是罪吗？绝对不是！然而，要不是藉着律法，我就不知道什么是罪。如果律法没有说“不可贪心”，我就不知道什么是贪心；

標準譯本 (繁) 那麼，我們要怎麼說呢？難道律法是罪嗎？絕對不是！然而，要不是藉著律法，我就不知道什麼是罪。如果律法沒有說「不可貪心」，我就不知道什麼是貪心；

易读圣经 那么我们可以得出什么结论呢？律法是罪吗？当然不是！除非法律定义罪，否则我不会知道何为罪。如果律法没有说“不要渴望拥有属于别人的东西”，我就无法意识到想拥有他人之物为错。

现代标点和合本 (简) 这样，我们可说什么呢？律法是罪吗？断乎不是。只是非因律法，我就不知何为罪。非律法说“不可起贪心”，我就不知何为贪心。

現代標點和合本 (繁) 這樣，我們可說什麼呢？律法是罪嗎？斷乎不是。只是非因律法，我就不知何為罪。非律法說「不可起貪心」，我就不知何為貪心。

普通话本 你们会认为我说罪恶和律法是一样的，这想法不正确。但是，律法是我知道罪恶含义的唯一途径，否则，我就不会知道贪恋不属于我的东西是错误的。律法说: “不可贪婪属于别人的东西。”那么，我们该说什么呢？我们能说律法是罪恶的吗？当然不能！但若不是因为律法，我就不知道什么是罪。的确，假如律法不说: “不可有贪欲。”我就不会知道贪婪是什么。