Євр Євреїв, розділ Послання до євреїв, розділ 8
Бо якби перший Завіт був бездоганним, то не було б потреби в другому.8:7 Або: не шукалося б місця.
Židům 8:7 v různých překladech
Ukrajinština
Огієнко
Бо коли б отой перший був бездоганний, не шукалося б місця для другого.
УСП
Якби та перша угода Бога з людьми була бездоганною, то не було б і потреби в новій.
Čeština
B21
Kdyby té první smlouvě nebylo co vytknout, nebylo by ji potřeba nahrazovat jinou.
BKR
Nebo kdyby ona první byla bez úhony, nebylo by hledáno místa druhé.
SNC
Kdyby stará smlouva neměla vady, nebyla by nahrazována novou.
Angličtina
KJV (66 books)
For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second.
AFINT (Exp US)
For had that first covenant been faultless, no occasion would have been sought for a second.
AFINT (Lit US)
For if that first covenant had been faultless, no place would have been sought for a second.
ASV
For if that first covenant had been faultless, then would no place have been sought for a second.
BSB
For if that first covenant had been without fault, no place would have been sought for a second.
DRA
For if that former had been faultless, there should not indeed a place have been sought for a second.
EMTV
For if that first covenant had been faultless, then no occasion would have been sought for a second.
FBV
If that first agreement had been perfect, then a second wouldn't have been necessary.
GNV
For if that first Testament had bene vnblameable, no place should haue bene sought for the second.
LSV
for if that first were faultless, a place would not have been sought for a second.
NASB
For if that first covenant had been free of fault, no circumstances would have been sought for a second. NASB 2020
NIV (US)
For if there had been nothing wrong with that first covenant, no place would have been sought for another.
OJB
For if the Brit HaRishonah had been without fault, it would not have been necessary to speak about a Brit HaShniyah.
TCENT
For if that first covenant had been faultless, there would have been no need to look for a second one.
T4T
If that first covenant had been perfectly adequate [LIT], God would not have thought that he needed another covenant/agreement to replace it. But it was not adequate, so he needed a new one.
WEB (US)
For if that first covenant had been faultless, then no place would have been sought for a second.