来Heb 希伯来书Židům, 章kapitola 希伯来书List Židům, 章kapitola 8

Židům 8:7 v různých překladech

Čínština

当代译本 (简) 因为如果第一个约没有缺点，就不必另立新约了。

當代譯本 (繁) 因為如果第一個約沒有缺點，就不必另立新約了。

标准译本 (简) 原来，如果那第一个约是无可指责的，就没有寻求第二个约的必要了，

標準譯本 (繁) 原來，如果那第一個約是無可指責的，就沒有尋求第二個約的必要了，

现代标点和合本 (简) 那前约若没有瑕疵，就无处寻求后约了。

現代標點和合本 (繁) 那前約若沒有瑕疵，就無處尋求後約了。

普通话本 假如第一个契约无懈可击，那就不需要再有第二个契约取代它了。

Čeština

B21 Kdyby té první smlouvě nebylo co vytknout, nebylo by ji potřeba nahrazovat jinou.

BKR Nebo kdyby ona první byla bez úhony, nebylo by hledáno místa druhé.

SNC Kdyby stará smlouva neměla vady, nebyla by nahrazována novou.

Angličtina

KJV (66 books) +3 For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second.

AFINT (Exp US) +1 For had that first covenant been faultless, no occasion would have been sought for a second.

AFINT (Lit US) +1 For if that first covenant had been faultless, no place would have been sought for a second.

ASV +1 For if that first covenant had been faultless, then would no place have been sought for a second.

BSB +1 For if that first covenant had been without fault, no place would have been sought for a second.

DRA For if that former had been faultless, there should not indeed a place have been sought for a second.

EMTV For if that first covenant had been faultless, then no occasion would have been sought for a second.

FBV If that first agreement had been perfect, then a second wouldn't have been necessary.

GNV For if that first Testament had bene vnblameable, no place should haue bene sought for the second.

LSV for if that first were faultless, a place would not have been sought for a second.

NASB For if that first covenant had been free of fault, no circumstances would have been sought for a second. NASB 2020

NIV (US) +1 For if there had been nothing wrong with that first covenant, no place would have been sought for another.

OJB For if the Brit HaRishonah had been without fault, it would not have been necessary to speak about a Brit HaShniyah.

TCENT For if that first covenant had been faultless, there would have been no need to look for a second one.

T4T If that first covenant had been perfectly adequate [LIT], God would not have thought that he needed another covenant/agreement to replace it. But it was not adequate, so he needed a new one.

WEB (US) +7 For if that first covenant had been faultless, then no place would have been sought for a second.