Php Filipperbrevet, kapitel Filipperbrevet, kapitel 2
Filiplastele 2:6 eri tõlgetes
Rootsi
SRB26
vilken, då han var i Guds gestalt, inte ansåg att vara jämlik Gud som något att hålla fast vid,
SKB
[Vers 6-11 innehåller några ovanliga grekiska ord och har en poetisk form som liknar en sång. Detta är antagligen en tidig kristen hymn eller dikt som Paulus citerar, liknande exempel finns i 1 Tim 3:16 och 2 Tim 2:11-13.] Han som var till (existerade; preexisterade) i Guds gestalt [iklädd Guds väsen – hade Guds hela fullhet, se Joh 12:41; Jes 6:1], men inte räknade det som en trofé (ett segerbyte; en skatt att gripa tag i och hålla fast vid) att vara jämlik Gud,
Eesti
OECV
kes, olles Jumala kuju, ei hoidnud kinni õigusest olla Jumalaga võrdne,
Inglise
KJV (66 books)
Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:
AFINT (Exp US)
who, though He existed in the very form of God, did not regard His equality with God as something to exploit for His own advantage,
AFINT (Lit US)
who, although He existed in the form of God, did not consider equality with God a thing to be grasped,
ASV
who, existing in the form of God, counted not the being on an equality with God a thing to be grasped,
BSB
Who, existing in the form of God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
EMTV
who, existing in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God,
FBV
Though in his nature he was always God, he wasn't concerned to cling onto his equality with God.
GNV
Who being in ye forme of God, thought it no robberie to be equall with God:
LSV
who, being in the form of God, thought [it] not something to be seized to be equal to God,
NASB
who, as He already existed in the form of God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped, NASB 2020
NIV (US)
Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage;
NMV
Who, being in the form of God-The Father, thought it not robbery to be equal with God-The Father:
OJB
Who, though existing in the demut of the mode of being of Elohim, nevertheless Moshiach did not regard being equal with G-d as a thing to be seized,
RV
who, being in the form of God, counted it not a prize to be on an equality with God,
TCENT
who, though he was in the form of God, did not consider equality with God as something to be exploited,
T4T
Although he has the same nature as God has, he did not insist on keeping all the privileges of being equal with God.
WEB (US)
who, existing in the form of God, didn’t consider equality with God a thing to be grasped,