फिलिप्प फिलिप्पियों, अध्याय फिलिप्पियों, अध्याय 2
जो अपने स्वरूप में यद्यपि साक्षात् परमेश्वर था,
किन्तु उसने परमेश्वर के साथ अपनी इस समानता को कभी
ऐसे महाकोष के समान नहीं समझा जिससे वह चिपका ही रहे।2 कुरिन्थ 4:4; कुलुस्स 1:15
Филипљанима 2:6 у различитим преводима
Српски
ДК (ћир.)
који, ако је и био у обличју Божијем, није се отимао да се упореди с Богом;
DK (lat.)
koji, ako je i bio u obličju Božijem, nije se otimao da se uporedi s Bogom;
НСП (ћир.)
Он, по обличју Бог, није сматрао да бити једнак Богу, јесте плен који треба отимати,
NSP (lat.)
On, po obličju Bog, nije smatrao da biti jednak Bogu, jeste plen koji treba otimati,
ССП (ћир.)
Он, који је у Божијем обличју, није сматрао пленом своју једнакост с Богом,
SSP (lat.)
On, koji je u Božijem obličju, nije smatrao plenom svoju jednakost s Bogom,
Енглески
KJV (66 books)
Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:
AFINT (Exp US)
who, though He existed in the very form of God, did not regard His equality with God as something to exploit for His own advantage,
AFINT (Lit US)
who, although He existed in the form of God, did not consider equality with God a thing to be grasped,
ASV
who, existing in the form of God, counted not the being on an equality with God a thing to be grasped,
BSB
Who, existing in the form of God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
EMTV
who, existing in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God,
FBV
Though in his nature he was always God, he wasn't concerned to cling onto his equality with God.
GNV
Who being in ye forme of God, thought it no robberie to be equall with God:
LSV
who, being in the form of God, thought [it] not something to be seized to be equal to God,
NIV (US)
Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage;
NMV
Who, being in the form of God-The Father, thought it not robbery to be equal with God-The Father:
OJB
Who, though existing in the demut of the mode of being of Elohim, nevertheless Moshiach did not regard being equal with G-d as a thing to be seized,
RV
who, being in the form of God, counted it not a prize to be on an equality with God,
TCENT
who, though he was in the form of God, did not consider equality with God as something to be exploited,
T4T
Although he has the same nature as God has, he did not insist on keeping all the privileges of being equal with God.
WEB (US)
who, existing in the form of God, didn’t consider equality with God a thing to be grasped,