Hebฮบ Židůmฮีบรู, kapitolaบทที่ List Židůmฮีบรู, kapitolaบทที่ 7

ฉบับแปล เปรียบเทียบ

Lévijská služba nebyla s to přivést Boží lid k dokonalosti. Proto bylo třeba jiné služby a jiného kněze – a to podle řádu Malkísedekova. Je zřejmé, že přenesením kněžství zaniká zákonité oprávnění pro trvání lévijské služby. Gal 2:21; Heb 8:7

ฮีบรู 7:11–13 ในหลายฉบับแปล

เช็ก

B21 ¹¹Kdyby levitské kněžství vedlo k dokonalosti (kvůli níž byl lidu dán Zákon), proč by ještě bylo potřeba, aby povstal jiný kněz podle Melchisedechova řádu, a nebyl jmenován podle Áronova řádu? ¹²Se změnou kněžství ovšem nutně nastává i změna Zákona. ¹³Ten, o kom se tu mluví, přece patří k jinému pokolení, z něhož nikdy nikdo u oltáře nesloužil.

BKR ¹¹A protož byla-liť dokonalost spasení skrze Levítské kněžství, (nebo za toho kněžství vydán jest lidu Zákon,) jakáž toho byla potřeba, aby jiný kněz podle řádu Melchisedechova povstal, a nebyl již více podle řádu Aronova jmenován? ¹²A poněvadž jest kněžství přeneseno, musiloť také i Zákona přenesení býti. ¹³Nebo ten, o kterémž se to praví, jiného jest pokolení, z kteréhožto žádný při oltáři v službě nebyl.

ไทย

OTCV ¹¹ถ้ามนุษย์บรรลุความสมบูรณ์แบบที่พระเจ้าประสงค์ได้ทางระบอบปุโรหิตของเลวี (เพราะประชาชนได้รับกฎบัญญัติทางระบอบนี้) แล้วทำไมยังต้องมีปุโรหิตอีกคนตามแบบของเมลคีเซเดค ไม่ใช่ตามแบบของอาโรน ¹²เพราะเมื่อระบอบปุโรหิตเปลี่ยน กฎบัญญัติก็ต้องเปลี่ยนด้วย ¹³พระองค์ที่เรากำลังพูดถึงนี้มาจากเผ่าอื่น และไม่มีใครจากเผ่านี้เคยรับใช้ที่แท่นบูชา

ขจง. ¹¹ชาวอิสราเอลได้รับกฎของโมเสส ซึ่งกฎนั้นขึ้นอยู่กับระบอบนักบวชของเลวี แต่ระบอบนี้ไม่สามารถทำให้เกิดความสมบูรณ์แบบนั้นได้ เพราะถ้ามันทำได้ ทำไมยังต้องมีนักบวชอีกคนหนึ่งมา ซึ่งเป็นไปตามแบบของเมลคีเซเดค ไม่ใช่ตามแบบของอาโรน ¹²เมื่อเปลี่ยนระบอบนักบวชไป กฎก็ต้องเปลี่ยนไปเป็นอย่างอื่นด้วย ¹³เราเห็นได้ว่าระบอบนั้นเปลี่ยนแปลงไปแล้ว เพราะพระเยซูคนที่เราพูดถึงนี้ มาจากอีกเผ่าหนึ่งที่ไม่ใช่เผ่าเลวี และยังไม่มีใครเลยในเผ่าของพระเยซู ที่เคยเป็นนักบวชคอยรับใช้อยู่ที่หน้าแท่นบูชา

อังกฤษ

KJV (66 books) ¹¹If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron? ¹²For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law. ¹³For he of whom these things are spoken pertaineth to another tribe, of which no man gave attendance at the altar.

AFINT (Exp US) ¹¹Now if perfection had been achievable through the Levitical priesthood, for based on it the people received the Law, what further necessity existed for another priest to arise according to the order of Melchizedek rather than being designated according to the order of Aaron? ¹²For when the priesthood undergoes change, necessarily a change of Law must also occur. ¹³For the One about whom these statements are made belonged to a different tribe, from which nobody has attended the altar.

AFINT (Lit US) ¹¹Now if perfection were through the Levitical priesthood—for on the basis of it the people received the Law—what further need would there have been for another priest to arise according to the order of Melchizedek, and not said to be according to the order of Aaron? ¹²For when the priesthood is changed, of necessity, a change of Law also takes place. ¹³For the One of whom these things are spoken belonged to another tribe, from which no one has served at the altar.

ASV ¹¹Now if there was perfection through the Levitical priesthood (for under it hath the people received the law), what further need was there that another priest should arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be reckoned after the order of Aaron? ¹²For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law. ¹³For he of whom these things are said belongeth to another tribe, from which no man hath given attendance at the altar.

BSB ¹¹Now if perfection could have been attained through the Levitical priesthood ( for on this basis the people received the law), why was there still need for another priest to appear — one in the order of Melchizedek and not in the order of Aaron? ¹²For when the priesthood is changed, the law must be changed as well. ¹³He of whom these things are said belonged to a different tribe, from which no one has ever served at the altar.

DRA ¹¹If then perfection was by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise according to the order of Melchisedech, and not be called according to the order of Aaron? ¹²For the priesthood being translated, it is necessary that a translation also be made of the law. ¹³For he, of whom these things are spoken, is of another tribe, of which no one attended on the altar.

EMTV ¹¹Therefore, if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people have received the law), why is there yet a need for another priest to rise, after the order of Melchizedek, and not to be called after the order of Aaron? ¹²For the priesthood being changed, of necessity there occurs a change of law also. ¹³For He concerning whom these things are spoken belongs to another tribe, from which no one has officiated at the altar.

FBV ¹¹Now if perfection could have been achieved through the priesthood of Levi (for that's how the law was received), what was the need for another priest to come following the order of Melchizedek, and not following the order of Aaron? ¹²If the priesthood is changed, then the law needs to be changed too. ¹³The one we're talking about comes from a different tribe, a tribe that has never provided priests to serve at the altar.

GNV ¹¹If therefore perfection had bene by the Priesthoode of the Leuites (for vnder it the Lawe was established to the people) what needed it furthermore, that another Priest should rise after the order of Melchi-sedec, and not to be called after the order of Aaron? ¹²For if the Priesthood be changed, then of necessitie must there be a change of the Lawe. ¹³For hee of whome these things are spoken, perteineth vnto another tribe, whereof no man serued at the altar.

LSV ¹¹If indeed, then, perfection were through the Levitical priesthood—for the people under it had received law—what further need, according to the order of Melchizedek, for another priest to arise, and not to be called according to the order of Aaron? ¹²For the priesthood being changed, of necessity also, a change comes of the Law, ¹³for He of whom these things are said in another tribe has had part, of whom no one gave attendance at the altar,

NASB ¹¹So if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood (for on the basis of it the people received the Law), what further need was there for another priest to arise according to the order of Melchizedek, and not be designated according to the order of Aaron? ¹²For when the priesthood is changed, of necessity there takes place a change of law also. ¹³For the one about whom these things are said belongs to another tribe, from which no one has officiated at the altar. NASB 2020

NIV (US) ¹¹If perfection could have been attained through the Levitical priesthood—and indeed the law given to the people established that priesthood—why was there still need for another priest to come, one in the order of Melchizedek, not in the order of Aaron? ¹²For when the priesthood is changed, the law must be changed also. ¹³He of whom these things are said belonged to a different tribe, and no one from that tribe has ever served at the altar.

NMV ¹¹If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need [was there] that another priest should rise after the order of Malki-Tzedek [king of righteousness], and not be called after the order of Aharon [Bright, Very High]? ¹²For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law. ¹³For he of whom these things are spoken pertains to another tribe, of which no man gave attendance at the altar.

OJB ¹¹Now if shleimut (completeness) had been attainable through the Kehunah of Levi — for under it came the Mattan Torah (giving of the Torah) to the Am Brit — what further need would there have been to speak of another KOHEN arising “according to the order of Malki-Tzedek” rather than “al divrati Aharon”? ¹²For when there is a “changing of the guard” of the Kehunah (Priesthood), this behechrach (necessarily) also affects the Torah. ¹³For the One about whom these things are said belonged to a different shevet (tribe), from which no one has officiated at the Mizbe'ach.

TCENT ¹¹Now if perfection had been attainable through the Levitical priesthood (for under this priesthood the people received the law), what further need would there have been for another priest to arise according to the order of Melchizedek rather than the order of Aaron? ¹²For when the priesthood is changed, the law must also be changed. ¹³Now he of whom these things are spoken belongs to a different tribe, from which no one has ever served at the altar.

T4T ¹¹God gave his laws to his people at the same time he gave regulations about the priests. So, if what the priests who were descended from Levi did could have provided a way for God to completely forgive people for disobeying those laws, certainly no other priest like Melchizedek would have been necessary. [RHQ] Instead, priests who were descended from Aaron, Levi’s descendant, would have been adequate. ¹²But we know they were not adequate, because a new type of priest like Melchizedek has come. And since God has appointed a new type of priest, he also had to change the regulations concerning how priests were appointed {he appointed priests}. ¹³Jesus, the one about whom I am saying these things, is a descendant of someone else, not a descendant of Levi. None of the men from whom Jesus descended ever served as priests [MTY].

WEB (US) ¹¹Now if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people have received the law), what further need was there for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called after the order of Aaron? ¹²For the priesthood being changed, there is of necessity a change made also in the law. ¹³For he of whom these things are said belongs to another tribe, from which no one has officiated at the altar.