HebHb HebrewsHebreus, chaptercapítulo Epistle to the HebrewsEpístola aos Hebreus, chaptercapítulo 7

Traduções Comparar

If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need [was there] that another priest should rise after the order of Malki-Tzedek [king of righteousness], and not be called after the order of Aharon [Bright, Very High]?Gal 2:21; Heb 8:7

Hebreus 7:11 em diferentes traduções

Inglês

KJV (66 books) If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?

AFINT (Exp US) Now if perfection had been achievable through the Levitical priesthood, for based on it the people received the Law, what further necessity existed for another priest to arise according to the order of Melchizedek rather than being designated according to the order of Aaron?

AFINT (Lit US) Now if perfection were through the Levitical priesthood—for on the basis of it the people received the Law—what further need would there have been for another priest to arise according to the order of Melchizedek, and not said to be according to the order of Aaron?

ASV Now if there was perfection through the Levitical priesthood (for under it hath the people received the law), what further need was there that another priest should arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be reckoned after the order of Aaron?

BSB Now if perfection could have been attained through the Levitical priesthood ( for on this basis the people received the law), why was there still need for another priest to appear — one in the order of Melchizedek and not in the order of Aaron?

DRA If then perfection was by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise according to the order of Melchisedech, and not be called according to the order of Aaron?

EMTV Therefore, if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people have received the law), why is there yet a need for another priest to rise, after the order of Melchizedek, and not to be called after the order of Aaron?

FBV Now if perfection could have been achieved through the priesthood of Levi (for that's how the law was received), what was the need for another priest to come following the order of Melchizedek, and not following the order of Aaron?

GNV If therefore perfection had bene by the Priesthoode of the Leuites (for vnder it the Lawe was established to the people) what needed it furthermore, that another Priest should rise after the order of Melchi-sedec, and not to be called after the order of Aaron?

LSV If indeed, then, perfection were through the Levitical priesthood—for the people under it had received law—what further need, according to the order of Melchizedek, for another priest to arise, and not to be called according to the order of Aaron?

NASB So if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood (for on the basis of it the people received the Law), what further need was there for another priest to arise according to the order of Melchizedek, and not be designated according to the order of Aaron? NASB 2020

NIV (US) If perfection could have been attained through the Levitical priesthood—and indeed the law given to the people established that priesthood—why was there still need for another priest to come, one in the order of Melchizedek, not in the order of Aaron?

OJB Now if shleimut (completeness) had been attainable through the Kehunah of Levi — for under it came the Mattan Torah (giving of the Torah) to the Am Brit — what further need would there have been to speak of another KOHEN arising “according to the order of Malki-Tzedek” rather than “al divrati Aharon”?

TCENT Now if perfection had been attainable through the Levitical priesthood (for under this priesthood the people received the law), what further need would there have been for another priest to arise according to the order of Melchizedek rather than the order of Aaron?

T4T God gave his laws to his people at the same time he gave regulations about the priests. So, if what the priests who were descended from Levi did could have provided a way for God to completely forgive people for disobeying those laws, certainly no other priest like Melchizedek would have been necessary. [RHQ] Instead, priests who were descended from Aaron, Levi’s descendant, would have been adequate.

WEB (US) Now if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people have received the law), what further need was there for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called after the order of Aaron?

Português

BLT Então, se a perfeição tivesse sido alcançada por meio do sacerdócio de Levi, pois foi assim que a lei foi recebida, por que haveria a necessidade de vir outro sacerdote, que seguisse a ordem do sacerdócio de Melquisedeque e, não, a de Arão?

NBV-P Se os sacerdotes judaicos e as suas leis fossem capazes de nos salvar, por que então Deus precisou mandar Cristo como sacerdote da mesma ordem de Melquisedeque, em vez de mandar alguém da ordem de Arão — a ordem à qual pertenciam todos os outros sacerdotes?

TfTP Deus deu suas leis ao seu povo na mesma ocasião em que entregou os regulamentos sobre os sacerdotes. Por isso, se aquilo que faziam os sacerdotes descendentes de Levi pudesse ter proporcionado um meio para Deus perdoar integralmente as pessoas por terem desobedecido a essas leis, com certeza não teria sido preciso nenhum outro sacerdote como Melquisedeque./ por que teria sido preciso algum outro sacerdote como Melquisedeque?—[RHQ] Pelo contrário, os sacerdotes descendentes de Arão, descendente de Levi, teriam sido plenamente satisfatórios.

VFL Foi por meio do ensino dos sacerdotes da família de Levi que o povo recebeu a lei de Moisés. Esses sacerdotes, porém, não conseguiram fazer com que as pessoas se tornassem perfeitas. Por causa disso, foi preciso que aparecesse um outro sacerdote, de acordo com o sacerdócio de Melquisedeque, e não de acordo com o sacerdócio de Arão.