ФлпPhp ФилипљанимаFilipeni, поглављеcapitolul Посланица ФилипљанимаEpistola către Filipeni, поглављеcapitolul 2

Filipeni 2:6 în diferite traduceri

Sârbă

ДК (ћир.) који, ако је и био у обличју Божијем, није се отимао да се упореди с Богом;

DK (lat.) koji, ako je i bio u obličju Božijem, nije se otimao da se uporedi s Bogom;

НСП (ћир.) Он, по обличју Бог, није сматрао да бити једнак Богу, јесте плен који треба отимати,

NSP (lat.) On, po obličju Bog, nije smatrao da biti jednak Bogu, jeste plen koji treba otimati,

SSP (lat.) On, koji je u Božijem obličju, nije smatrao plenom svoju jednakost s Bogom,

Română

BS (1914) Carele în chipui lui Dumnezeu fiind, nu răpire au socotit a fi el întocma cu Dumnezeu;

Engleză

KJV (66 books) +3 Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:

AFINT (Exp US) +1 who, though He existed in the very form of God, did not regard His equality with God as something to exploit for His own advantage,

AFINT (Lit US) +1 who, although He existed in the form of God, did not consider equality with God a thing to be grasped,

ASV who, existing in the form of God, counted not the being on an equality with God a thing to be grasped,

BSB +1 Who, existing in the form of God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,

EMTV who, existing in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God,

FBV Though in his nature he was always God, he wasn't concerned to cling onto his equality with God.

GNV Who being in ye forme of God, thought it no robberie to be equall with God:

LSV who, being in the form of God, thought [it] not something to be seized to be equal to God,

NASB who, as He already existed in the form of God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped, NASB 2020

NIV (US) +1 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage;

NMV Who, being in the form of God-The Father, thought it not robbery to be equal with God-The Father:

OJB Who, though existing in the demut of the mode of being of Elohim, nevertheless Moshiach did not regard being equal with G-d as a thing to be seized,

RV who, being in the form of God, counted it not a prize to be on an equality with God,

TCENT who, though he was in the form of God, did not consider equality with God as something to be exploited,

T4T Although he has the same nature as God has, he did not insist on keeping all the privileges of being equal with God.

WEB (US) +7 who, existing in the form of God, didn’t consider equality with God a thing to be grasped,