РимRom РимлянамRomani, главаcapitolul Послание к РимлянамEpistola către Romani, главаcapitolul 3

Romani 3:27 în diferite traduceri

Rusă

РСП (66 кн.) +2 Где же то́, чем бы хвалиться? уничтожено. Каким законом? законом дел? Нет, но законом веры.

Заокская (Кулаков) Допустимо ль тогда хвастовство? Исключается полностью. Но каким же законом? Тем, что требует дел? Нет! Законом веры.

ВП +2 Итак, что же с нашей похвальбой? Её больше нет. Какой закон это сделал? Закон дел? Нет, закон веры.

СП (БЛ) Где же тогда повод для гордости собой? Его нет! Можем ли мы гордиться собой на основании того, что требует закон? Нет! Скорее на основании веры.

Десницкий Чем же нам теперь хвалиться? Нечем. Поводов для похвальбы не оставил нам Закон, который говорит о делах? Нет, не он, а вера.

Кассиан Итак, где же похвала? Исключена раз навсегда. Каким законом? Законом дел? Нет, но законом веры.

Română

BS (1914) Deci unde este lauda? S’a încuiat. Prin care lege? A faptelor? Nu, ci prin legea credinței.

Engleză

KJV (66 books) +2 Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? of works? Nay: but by the law of faith.

AFINT (Exp US) +1 Where then is there any room for human boasting and self-congratulation? It has been completely excluded and shut out. On what basis or principle? By the principle of performing works to earn salvation? No, absolutely not! But rather by the principle of faith alone.

AFINT (Lit US) +1 Where then is boasting? It has been shut out. By what law? That of works? No, but by the law of faith.

ASV +1 Where then is the glorying? It is excluded. By what manner of law? of works? Nay: but by a law of faith.

BSB +1 Where, then, is boasting? It is excluded. On what principle? On that of works? No, but on that of faith.

DRA Where is then thy boasting? It is excluded. By what law? Of works? No, but by the law of faith.

EMTV Where then is boasting? It is excluded. Through what law? Of works? No, but through the law of faith.

FBV So do we have anything to boast about then? Absolutely not, there's no place for that! And why's that? Is it because we follow the law of observing requirements? No, we follow the law of trusting in God.

GNV Where is then the reioycing? It is excluded. By what Lawe? of woorkes? Nay: but by the Lawe of faith.

LSV Where then [is] the boasting? It was excluded; by what law? Of works? No, but by a law of faith:

NASB Where then is boasting? It has been excluded. By what kind of law? Of works? No, but by a law of faith. NASB 2020

NIV (US) +1 Where, then, is boasting? It is excluded. Because of what law? The law that requires works? No, because of the law that requires faith.

NMV Where [is] boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? of works? No: but by the law of faith.

OJB Where then is boasting? It has been memayet (precluded, excluded). By what kind of gezetz? Of depending on [zokheh-earning] ma'asim? No, on the contrary, by the (debt). Torah of Emunah (the Law of Faith, that is, the Law understood in terms of emunah).

TCENT Where then is boasting? It is excluded. By what kind of law? By a law of works? No, but by the law of faith.

T4T It is not at all [RHQ] because of our obeying the laws of Moses that God erases the record of our sins. So, ◄there is no way that we can boast that God does that because of our obeying those laws./how can we boast about God erasing the record of our sins because of our obeying those laws?► [RHQ] Instead, it is because of our believing/trusting in Christ that God erases the record of our sins.

WEB (US) +7 Where then is the boasting? It is excluded. By what kind of law? Of works? No, but by a law of faith.