And this I say, [that] the covenant, that was confirmed before of God-The Father in Moshiach [Messiah], the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.Exo 12:40; Act 7:6
And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.
What I am saying is this: The Law, which came four hundred and thirty years later, does not cancel a covenant previously confirmed by God, so as to invalidate the promise.
And I say this: The Law, which came after four hundred and thirty years, does not invalidate a covenant previously ratified by God, in order to nullify the promise.
Now this I say: A covenant confirmed beforehand by God, the law, which came four hundred and thirty years after, doth not disannul, so as to make the promise of none effect.
BSBWhat I mean is this: The law that came 430 years later does not revoke the covenant previously established by God, so as to nullify the promise.
DRANow this I say, that the testament which was confirmed by God, the law which was made after four hundred and thirty years, doth not disannul, to make the promise of no effect.
EMTVAnd this I say, that the law, which was four hundred and thirty years later, does not annul the covenant previously confirmed to Christ by God, so that it make the promise of no effect.
FBVLet me explain. The law, coming four hundred and thirty years later, doesn't cancel the previous agreement that God made, breaking the promise.
GNVAnd this I say, that the couenant that was confirmed afore of God in respect of Christ, the Lawe which was foure hundreth and thirtie yeeres after, can not disanull, that it shoulde make the promise of none effect.
LSVand this I say, a covenant confirmed before by God to Christ, the Law, that came four hundred and thirty years after, does not set aside, to make void the promise,
MSBWhat I mean is this: The law that came 430 years later does not revoke the covenant previously established by God in Christ, so as to nullify the promise.
What I mean is this: The law, introduced 430 years later, does not set aside the covenant previously established by God and thus do away with the promise.
OJBAnd this I say: a brit (covenant), which was previously confirmed by Hashem, cannot be annulled so as to abolish the havtachah (promise) by the Mattan Torah — which was given arba me'ot usheloshim shanah (four hundred and thirty years) later.
TCENTMy point is this: The law, which came four hundred and thirty years later, cannot annul a covenant previously ratified by God to Christ, so as to invalidate the promise.
T4TThis is what I am saying: Since God gave the laws to the Jews 430 years after he declared to Abraham what he was promising to do for Abraham, those laws do not cancel that agreement with Abraham that God himself had previously agreed about [PRS].
Now I say this: A covenant confirmed beforehand by God in Christ, the law, which came four hundred thirty years after, does not annul, so as to make the promise of no effect.
Now I say this: A covenant confirmed beforehand by God in Christ, the law, which came four hundred and thirty years after, does not annul, so as to make the promise of no effect.
WMB (US)Now I say this: A covenant confirmed beforehand by God in Messiah, the law, which came four hundred thirty years after, does not annul, so as to make the promise of no effect.
WMB (UK)Now I say this: A covenant confirmed beforehand by God in Messiah, the law, which came four hundred and thirty years after, does not annul, so as to make the promise of no effect.
Português
BLTDeixem-me explicar. A lei, que chegou quatrocentos e trinta anos depois, não anula o acordo anterior que Deus fez e não quebra a promessa.
NBV-PEis o que eu estou procurando dizer: A promessa de Deus, de salvar por meio da fé — e Deus escreveu e assinou esta aliança — não podia ser cancelada nem mudada quatrocentos e trinta anos mais tarde quando a Lei foi dada por Deus.
TfTPÉ isto que estou dizendo: Já que Deus deu as leis aos judeus 430 anos após ter declarado a Abraão aquilo que estava prometendo fazer por Abraão, aquelas leis não cancelam esse acordo com Abraão que tinha sido confirmado por Deus {que Deus mesmo tinha antes confirmado} [PRS].
VFLO que eu quero dizer é isto: Deus fez uma aliança com Abraão e prometeu cumpri-la. A lei de Moisés, que veio quatrocentos e trinta anos mais tarde, não pôde cancelar essa aliança ou anular essa promessa.
As suas traduções são o conjunto da última comparação que abriu com «Comparar» ou que lembrou; enquanto não houver conjunto, a primeira comparação aberta diretamente — a partir de um marcador ou de um link externo ao site — passa a sê-lo. Quando o conjunto tem pelo menos duas traduções e todas têm a passagem, a comparação abre sem o formulário de escolha.
Marque com uma estrela as traduções que deseja ter nos favoritos.
Fonte
Tamanho do texto
No princípio era o Verbo, e o Verbo estava com Deus, e o Verbo era Deus
Os reprodutores aparecem sem clique e não iniciam sozinhos; uma página com vídeo entra em contato com o youtube.com imediatamente. Enquanto esta opção estiver ativada, os vídeos são carregados do YouTube.
Carregar vídeos de
Se o YouTube não responder, o vídeo será carregado do servidor do site quando houver uma cópia lá.
Redefinir configurações
Todas as configurações serão redefinidas para os valores padrão. Tem certeza?