And this I say, [that] the covenant, that was confirmed before of God-The Father in Moshiach [Messiah], the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.Exo 12:40; Act 7:6
And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.
What I am saying is this: The Law, which came four hundred and thirty years later, does not cancel a covenant previously confirmed by God, so as to invalidate the promise.
And I say this: The Law, which came after four hundred and thirty years, does not invalidate a covenant previously ratified by God, in order to nullify the promise.
Now this I say: A covenant confirmed beforehand by God, the law, which came four hundred and thirty years after, doth not disannul, so as to make the promise of none effect.
BSBWhat I mean is this: The law that came 430 years later does not revoke the covenant previously established by God, so as to nullify the promise.
DRANow this I say, that the testament which was confirmed by God, the law which was made after four hundred and thirty years, doth not disannul, to make the promise of no effect.
EMTVAnd this I say, that the law, which was four hundred and thirty years later, does not annul the covenant previously confirmed to Christ by God, so that it make the promise of no effect.
FBVLet me explain. The law, coming four hundred and thirty years later, doesn't cancel the previous agreement that God made, breaking the promise.
GNVAnd this I say, that the couenant that was confirmed afore of God in respect of Christ, the Lawe which was foure hundreth and thirtie yeeres after, can not disanull, that it shoulde make the promise of none effect.
LSVand this I say, a covenant confirmed before by God to Christ, the Law, that came four hundred and thirty years after, does not set aside, to make void the promise,
MSBWhat I mean is this: The law that came 430 years later does not revoke the covenant previously established by God in Christ, so as to nullify the promise.
NASBWhat I am saying is this: the Law, which came 430 years later, does not invalidate a covenant previously ratified by God, so as to nullify the promise.NASB 2020
What I mean is this: The law, introduced 430 years later, does not set aside the covenant previously established by God and thus do away with the promise.
OJBAnd this I say: a brit (covenant), which was previously confirmed by Hashem, cannot be annulled so as to abolish the havtachah (promise) by the Mattan Torah — which was given arba me'ot usheloshim shanah (four hundred and thirty years) later.
TCENTMy point is this: The law, which came four hundred and thirty years later, cannot annul a covenant previously ratified by God to Christ, so as to invalidate the promise.
T4TThis is what I am saying: Since God gave the laws to the Jews 430 years after he declared to Abraham what he was promising to do for Abraham, those laws do not cancel that agreement with Abraham that God himself had previously agreed about [PRS].
Now I say this: A covenant confirmed beforehand by God in Christ, the law, which came four hundred thirty years after, does not annul, so as to make the promise of no effect.
Now I say this: A covenant confirmed beforehand by God in Christ, the law, which came four hundred and thirty years after, does not annul, so as to make the promise of no effect.
WMB (US)Now I say this: A covenant confirmed beforehand by God in Messiah, the law, which came four hundred thirty years after, does not annul, so as to make the promise of no effect.
WMB (UK)Now I say this: A covenant confirmed beforehand by God in Messiah, the law, which came four hundred and thirty years after, does not annul, so as to make the promise of no effect.
Svenska
SRB26Men det säger jag, att det testamente som tidigare av Gud hade förklarats giltigt i Kristus, kan inte upphävas av lagen som gavs 430 år senare, så att den skulle kunna sätta löftet ur kraft.
SKBDetta är vad jag menar, lagen som kom 430 år senare [än löftet till Abraham] kan inte annullera ett tidigare förbund (testamente) från Gud, så att löftet blir ogiltigt.
Bild med vers
Texten får inte plats – gör den mindre eller korta citatet.
Ingen inspelningIngen inspelning för det här kapitlet
Kortkommandon
P
Spela upp / pausa
M
Stäng av ljudet
+-
Volym
[]
10 sekunder bakåt / framåt
<>
Föregående / nästa kapitel
Inställningar
Kristi ord:För så älskade Gud världen
Dina översättningar är uppsättningen från den senaste jämförelsen du öppnade med ”Jämför” eller sparade; tills du har en uppsättning blir den första jämförelsen du öppnar direkt – från ett bokmärke eller en länk utanför webbplatsen – din uppsättning. När uppsättningen har minst två översättningar och alla har det här stället öppnas jämförelsen utan valformuläret.
Markera översättningar med en stjärna för att lägga dem i dina favoriter.
Typsnitt
Textstorlek
I begynnelsen var Ordet, och Ordet var hos Gud, och Ordet var Gud
Spelare visas utan klick och startar inte av sig själva; en sida med video kontaktar youtube.com direkt. Så länge inställningen är på laddas videor från YouTube.
Ladda videor från
Om YouTube inte svarar laddas videon från webbplatsens server, när det finns en kopia där.
Återställ inställningar
Alla inställningar återställs till standardvärdena. Är du säker?