Gal Galatians, chapter Epistle to the Galatians, chapter 3
Galaten 3:17 in verschillende vertalingen
Engels
KJV (66 books)
And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.
AFINT (Exp US)
What I am saying is this: The Law, which came four hundred and thirty years later, does not cancel a covenant previously confirmed by God, so as to invalidate the promise.
AFINT (Lit US)
And I say this: The Law, which came after four hundred and thirty years, does not invalidate a covenant previously ratified by God, in order to nullify the promise.
ASV
Now this I say: A covenant confirmed beforehand by God, the law, which came four hundred and thirty years after, doth not disannul, so as to make the promise of none effect.
BSB
What I mean is this: The law that came 430 years later does not revoke the covenant previously established by God, so as to nullify the promise.
DRA
Now this I say, that the testament which was confirmed by God, the law which was made after four hundred and thirty years, doth not disannul, to make the promise of no effect.
EMTV
And this I say, that the law, which was four hundred and thirty years later, does not annul the covenant previously confirmed to Christ by God, so that it make the promise of no effect.
FBV
Let me explain. The law, coming four hundred and thirty years later, doesn't cancel the previous agreement that God made, breaking the promise.
GNV
And this I say, that the couenant that was confirmed afore of God in respect of Christ, the Lawe which was foure hundreth and thirtie yeeres after, can not disanull, that it shoulde make the promise of none effect.
LSV
and this I say, a covenant confirmed before by God to Christ, the Law, that came four hundred and thirty years after, does not set aside, to make void the promise,
MSB
What I mean is this: The law that came 430 years later does not revoke the covenant previously established by God in Christ, so as to nullify the promise.
NASB
What I am saying is this: the Law, which came 430 years later, does not invalidate a covenant previously ratified by God, so as to nullify the promise. NASB 2020
NIV (US)
What I mean is this: The law, introduced 430 years later, does not set aside the covenant previously established by God and thus do away with the promise.
OJB
And this I say: a brit (covenant), which was previously confirmed by Hashem, cannot be annulled so as to abolish the havtachah (promise) by the Mattan Torah — which was given arba me'ot usheloshim shanah (four hundred and thirty years) later.
TCENT
My point is this: The law, which came four hundred and thirty years later, cannot annul a covenant previously ratified by God to Christ, so as to invalidate the promise.
T4T
This is what I am saying: Since God gave the laws to the Jews 430 years after he declared to Abraham what he was promising to do for Abraham, those laws do not cancel that agreement with Abraham that God himself had previously agreed about [PRS].
WEB (US)
Now I say this: A covenant confirmed beforehand by God in Christ, the law, which came four hundred thirty years after, does not annul, so as to make the promise of no effect.
WEB (UK)
Now I say this: A covenant confirmed beforehand by God in Christ, the law, which came four hundred and thirty years after, does not annul, so as to make the promise of no effect.
WMB (US)
Now I say this: A covenant confirmed beforehand by God in Messiah, the law, which came four hundred thirty years after, does not annul, so as to make the promise of no effect.
WMB (UK)
Now I say this: A covenant confirmed beforehand by God in Messiah, the law, which came four hundred and thirty years after, does not annul, so as to make the promise of no effect.
Nederlands
Canisius
Ik besluit dus: een vroegere geldige wilsbeschikking Gods wordt niet ongeldig gemaakt door een Wet, die vierhonderd dertig jaar later komt, zodat de Belofte zou komen te vervallen.
GBV
Ik bedoel dit: het verbond dat voorheen door God was bekrachtigd, is niet ongeldig verklaard door de Wet die 430 jaar later kwam. De belofte is dus niet ongeldig geworden.