GalGa. GalatiansGálatas, chaptercapítulo Epistle to the GalatiansCarta de Pablo a los Gálatas, chaptercapítulo 3

Traducciones Comparar

And this I say, [that] the covenant, that was confirmed before of God-The Father in Moshiach [Messiah], the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.Exo 12:40; Act 7:6

Gálatas 3:17 en diferentes traducciones

Inglés

KJV (66 books) And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.

AFINT (Exp US) What I am saying is this: The Law, which came four hundred and thirty years later, does not cancel a covenant previously confirmed by God, so as to invalidate the promise.

AFINT (Lit US) And I say this: The Law, which came after four hundred and thirty years, does not invalidate a covenant previously ratified by God, in order to nullify the promise.

ASV Now this I say: A covenant confirmed beforehand by God, the law, which came four hundred and thirty years after, doth not disannul, so as to make the promise of none effect.

BSB What I mean is this: The law that came 430 years later does not revoke the covenant previously established by God, so as to nullify the promise.

DRA Now this I say, that the testament which was confirmed by God, the law which was made after four hundred and thirty years, doth not disannul, to make the promise of no effect.

EMTV And this I say, that the law, which was four hundred and thirty years later, does not annul the covenant previously confirmed to Christ by God, so that it make the promise of no effect.

FBV Let me explain. The law, coming four hundred and thirty years later, doesn't cancel the previous agreement that God made, breaking the promise.

GNV And this I say, that the couenant that was confirmed afore of God in respect of Christ, the Lawe which was foure hundreth and thirtie yeeres after, can not disanull, that it shoulde make the promise of none effect.

LSV and this I say, a covenant confirmed before by God to Christ, the Law, that came four hundred and thirty years after, does not set aside, to make void the promise,

MSB What I mean is this: The law that came 430 years later does not revoke the covenant previously established by God in Christ, so as to nullify the promise.

NASB What I am saying is this: the Law, which came 430 years later, does not invalidate a covenant previously ratified by God, so as to nullify the promise. NASB 2020

NIV (US) What I mean is this: The law, introduced 430 years later, does not set aside the covenant previously established by God and thus do away with the promise.

OJB And this I say: a brit (covenant), which was previously confirmed by Hashem, cannot be annulled so as to abolish the havtachah (promise) by the Mattan Torah — which was given arba me'ot usheloshim shanah (four hundred and thirty years) later.

TCENT My point is this: The law, which came four hundred and thirty years later, cannot annul a covenant previously ratified by God to Christ, so as to invalidate the promise.

T4T This is what I am saying: Since God gave the laws to the Jews 430 years after he declared to Abraham what he was promising to do for Abraham, those laws do not cancel that agreement with Abraham that God himself had previously agreed about [PRS].

WEB (US) Now I say this: A covenant confirmed beforehand by God in Christ, the law, which came four hundred thirty years after, does not annul, so as to make the promise of no effect.

WEB (UK) Now I say this: A covenant confirmed beforehand by God in Christ, the law, which came four hundred and thirty years after, does not annul, so as to make the promise of no effect.

WMB (US) Now I say this: A covenant confirmed beforehand by God in Messiah, the law, which came four hundred thirty years after, does not annul, so as to make the promise of no effect.

WMB (UK) Now I say this: A covenant confirmed beforehand by God in Messiah, the law, which came four hundred and thirty years after, does not annul, so as to make the promise of no effect.

Español

RV1909 Esto pues digo: Que el contrato confirmado de Dios para con Cristo, la ley que fué hecha cuatrocientos treinta años después, no lo abroga, para invalidar la promesa.

NBV Lo que quiero decir es lo siguiente: Dios hizo un pacto con Abraham, y ese pacto no fue cancelado ni la promesa quedó anulada por la ley que vino cuatrocientos treinta años más tarde.

BES Esto digo: la Ley, que vino cuatrocientos treinta años después, no anula el pacto confirmado antes por Dios en Cristo, ni deja sin efecto la promesa.

PdDpt Esto digo: La Ley que vino 430 años después no invalida un Pacto previamente ratificado por Dios, para anular la promesa.

VBL (NT) Déjenme explicarles: La ley, que llegó cuatrocientos treinta años después, no cancela el pacto anterior que Dios había hecho, quebrantando la promesa.

PDT Lo que estoy diciendo es que el pacto que Dios hizo con Abraham fue oficial mucho antes de que llegara la ley. La ley llegó 430 años después. Por eso la ley no pudo anular el pacto ni cambiar las promesas de Dios.