And this I say, [that] the covenant, that was confirmed before of God-The Father in Moshiach [Messiah], the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.Exo 12:40; Act 7:6
And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.
What I am saying is this: The Law, which came four hundred and thirty years later, does not cancel a covenant previously confirmed by God, so as to invalidate the promise.
And I say this: The Law, which came after four hundred and thirty years, does not invalidate a covenant previously ratified by God, in order to nullify the promise.
Now this I say: A covenant confirmed beforehand by God, the law, which came four hundred and thirty years after, doth not disannul, so as to make the promise of none effect.
BSBWhat I mean is this: The law that came 430 years later does not revoke the covenant previously established by God, so as to nullify the promise.
DRANow this I say, that the testament which was confirmed by God, the law which was made after four hundred and thirty years, doth not disannul, to make the promise of no effect.
EMTVAnd this I say, that the law, which was four hundred and thirty years later, does not annul the covenant previously confirmed to Christ by God, so that it make the promise of no effect.
FBVLet me explain. The law, coming four hundred and thirty years later, doesn't cancel the previous agreement that God made, breaking the promise.
GNVAnd this I say, that the couenant that was confirmed afore of God in respect of Christ, the Lawe which was foure hundreth and thirtie yeeres after, can not disanull, that it shoulde make the promise of none effect.
LSVand this I say, a covenant confirmed before by God to Christ, the Law, that came four hundred and thirty years after, does not set aside, to make void the promise,
MSBWhat I mean is this: The law that came 430 years later does not revoke the covenant previously established by God in Christ, so as to nullify the promise.
NASBWhat I am saying is this: the Law, which came 430 years later, does not invalidate a covenant previously ratified by God, so as to nullify the promise.NASB 2020
What I mean is this: The law, introduced 430 years later, does not set aside the covenant previously established by God and thus do away with the promise.
OJBAnd this I say: a brit (covenant), which was previously confirmed by Hashem, cannot be annulled so as to abolish the havtachah (promise) by the Mattan Torah — which was given arba me'ot usheloshim shanah (four hundred and thirty years) later.
TCENTMy point is this: The law, which came four hundred and thirty years later, cannot annul a covenant previously ratified by God to Christ, so as to invalidate the promise.
T4TThis is what I am saying: Since God gave the laws to the Jews 430 years after he declared to Abraham what he was promising to do for Abraham, those laws do not cancel that agreement with Abraham that God himself had previously agreed about [PRS].
Now I say this: A covenant confirmed beforehand by God in Christ, the law, which came four hundred thirty years after, does not annul, so as to make the promise of no effect.
Now I say this: A covenant confirmed beforehand by God in Christ, the law, which came four hundred and thirty years after, does not annul, so as to make the promise of no effect.
WMB (US)Now I say this: A covenant confirmed beforehand by God in Messiah, the law, which came four hundred thirty years after, does not annul, so as to make the promise of no effect.
WMB (UK)Now I say this: A covenant confirmed beforehand by God in Messiah, the law, which came four hundred and thirty years after, does not annul, so as to make the promise of no effect.
Cebuano
APDAng buot kong ipasabot mao kini: adunay gisaad ang Dios kang Abraham. Ug kadto nga saad gihimo sa wala pa ang Kasugoan, tungod kay mga 430 pa ka tuig ang milabay una pa gihatag sa Dios ang Kasugoan. Busa kadtong gisaad sa Dios dili mahimo nga gubaon o wad-an ug bili sa Kasugoan.
Hulagway sa bersikulo
Dili mohaum ang teksto — pagamya kini o putla ang kinutlo.
Mga pulong ni Cristo:Kay gihigugma gayod sa Dios ang kalibotan
Ang imong mga hubad mao ang set sa kataposang pagtandi nga imong giablihan gamit ang “Itandi” o gihinumdoman; samtang wala pay set, ang unang pagtandi nga direkta nga giablihan — gikan sa bookmark o sa link gikan sa gawas sa site — mahimong set. Kung ang set adunay labing menos duha ka hubad ug ang tanan adunay niini nga bahin, maablihan ang pagtandi nga walay porma sa pagpili.
Butangi og bituon ang mga hubad nga gusto nimo sa mga paborito.
Font
Gidak-on sa teksto
Sa sinugdanan, anaa na ang Pulong. Ang Pulong kauban sa Dios, ug ang Pulong mao ang Dios
Makita dayon ang mga player nga walay pag-klik ug dili kini awtomatikong mo-play; ang panid nga adunay video mokontak dayon sa youtube.com. Samtang naka-on kini nga setting, ang mga video mo-load gikan sa YouTube.
Kargahi ang mga video gikan sa
Kung walay tubag ang YouTube, ang video makarga gikan sa server sa site kung adunay kopya didto.
I-reset ang mga setting
Ibalik namo ang tanang setting sa ilang default. Sigurado ka ba?